hamza mansour and others vs abdalla amin and others 2023 tzhc 17416 22 may 2023
The application was filed out of time, beyond the 60 days prescribed by law, and is therefore time barred. Time limitation is a jurisdictional issue and the court cannot entertain the application further.
- Citation
- hamza mansour and others vs abdalla amin and others 2023 tzhc 17416 22 may 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Hamza Mansour; Applicant: Abdulhakim Abeid; Applicant: Abdillah Saleh; Applicant: Abui Maftah; Applicant: Maruzuku Magongo; Applicant: The Registered Trustees of Jumaa Mosque Mwanza; Respondent: Abdallah Amin Abdallah; Respondent: Omary S. Mbalamwezi; Respondent: Khalid Abdallah; Respondent: Sherally Hussein Sherally; Respondent: Ibrahim Hussein; Respondent: Idrissa Abdallah; Respondent: The Administrator General; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Limitation of Actions, Preliminary Objection, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hamza Mansour
Applicant
Abdulhakim Abeid
Applicant
Abdillah Saleh
Applicant
Abui Maftah
Applicant
Maruzuku Magongo
Applicant
The Registered Trustees of Jumaa Mosque Mwanza
Applicant
Abdallah Amin Abdallah
Respondent
Omary S. Mbalamwezi
Respondent
Khalid Abdallah
Respondent
Sherally Hussein Sherally
Respondent
Ibrahim Hussein
Respondent
Idrissa Abdallah
Respondent
The Administrator General
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the preliminary objection on time limitation meets the threshold of a preliminary objection in law
- 2 Whether the application for stay of execution is time barred
- 3 Whether the application is incompetent and premature for failure to furnish security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed out of time, beyond the 60 days prescribed by law, and is therefore time barred. Time limitation is a jurisdictional issue and the court cannot entertain the application further.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed for being time barred under section 3(1) of the Law of Limitation Act [Cap 89 R.E 2019]
- Applicants to bear all costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment