19900910 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The appellant was involved from the outset in a fraudulent scheme to forge a cheque, utter it, and obtain money by false pretences. The circumstantial evidence, expert handwriting analysis, and the appellant's conduct justified the conviction. The omission of intent to defraud or deceive in the charge particulars...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19900910 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Harun S. Ngohomera (or Ngahemera); Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Forgery, Uttering False Documents, Obtaining Money by False Pretences, Defective Charge Particulars
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harun S. Ngohomera (or Ngahemera)
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was involved in the forgery of a cheque and related offences
- 2 Whether the omission of intent to defraud or deceive in the charge particulars rendered the charge bad
- 3 Whether the appellant was properly convicted on all counts
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was involved from the outset in a fraudulent scheme to forge a cheque, utter it, and obtain money by false pretences. The circumstantial evidence, expert handwriting analysis, and the appellant's conduct justified the conviction. The omission of intent to defraud or deceive in the charge particulars was a curable defect as the appellant was not prejudiced or embarrassed in his defence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
o:·rn:;L.ill.1, c:a:;LLL 01..s;.-; :i::ro. 1048 OF 1986 OF JI8S.1JlJCi1 CCUP..T 0-;;' IL..::.LL ·;IS:11.liCT .ll.T ICTSUTU K1:..1◊-:.:3:- ~l.F. Kii':L.'80, I;SQ.., RESIDENT fiLGIS'::Jltl.~:D 1-m:::::rrr:HER.£1. •••••••• 0 • • • • 0 • • 0 • • .fl.PPELLJ1HT ( ORG. l~CCUSND) versus ::-iTIJ R.~F.:J:BLIC •• 0 0 • • • " • " 0 • • • • • • ., • • • • • • RESPOrJ:D:cI.TT ( ORG. PRO::fc:;CUTOR) JUD G LUGAICTHGIR,":.2 J:- This appc::'.1 ['.J;::..;:;<:s fro:1 tho decision of tho District Col1..i -~ of Ila.la. at IG.sutu (Kimo.ro 3 sm:) 3 L.1 ;-rl1icb. t:·.. r; 2pp,,lln.11t Harun Sr, Ngohcmer2. i or Ngahemera) was convicted o1 _:Zo:-..y;c:r:,, uttcri112: ru1c. ob·~aining money b~t fclc( pretences. !-'G was claimed -'Ghr.:c 011 9.L:.,D5 tt.e: c".::-~,cllm1t fo:-:.·gorl a chP'.".'..le I'Tc• • .1'\ ♦ •• '0019 for 406,855/= pl.ll'portinc: ·;;o s.'_:_ow t.h2..t i-'c l'.c:d boon issued by tho T,· 1 ;o.,nin. Investment Baa.tlq that 01111~:.85 :10 uttcrcc. tho sci.i.d ch::iquc a.t the rln,sclo '.::mso Branch of tho Nationn,l Bc"".li.: of' Co::1mcrcq en(. -~;.ic._:;. on tho s:cmc occasion }.c, obtninoo 360,000/~ from the scicl Branch on the ;:, -:;rc."2gt!1 -of the 02id cheque,. FoL ::; iing conViction he was awarded co110t;.rro:1-ii priDo;~ sc-11·i;0i-:i.Jcs of throe ,7c2..rs for :< -rgory, three ., Ycnrs for uttori.1c o.11cl. si:;r ;;:::.~ro :.:'0~ __,·;j~,1.1. r.i:,1[;" mnr." r by fclsc : l' ,tcnccs. 0 Tho appon:l was c. 0 cinst conviction only :·.:.eel ,.'~-s ,~.rJucc. for the r:.ppcl.::. trli by learned cow1sol Hro I1dr2v. lh'• Sirnb::-.2~ ....l;c c,ppoc.-rod for the Rep½blic. ~ t 3pa:ration of ·i;his judgment su;..'-'fcrod dclQ .;.n c, vT...in t.%c.,1pt to obtain the doc t \cntary cxhibi ts tondcrod at tho ·cx-ic.J.. I e:m thorcfo:;.'c n·i tirJG· tho. judgment ui th, •t t lu1Ving soon them, ~tt .I run cncol'!XO.CCd to do so i·~i t~ou.t :fcc:a:- of error _by tl10 E ;isi vc mind .:..-:,-t · tho lon.rnod tti.:::,l m.:::,~;istrato r:nd tlic lu.c~ ni ty tr1ct charcJ.ctcriscs 1 •r judgments. The fo.cts rovcci,1 a well orgn:.1ioocl pla.n to dofrn.ud tho br1.nks, On 9.4.85 the TanzaniD- Investment ·:ac1,nk (TIB) is:mcd. a cheque lfo.,120019 (rtii .. :i•) for 4CC 1 855/c: pcyc.blo -~o tho P.rincipn.l Sccrctc.:r,7, Treasury, uhicl1 ua.s C:l ly received \ at tho Troe,stU'Y, b..."'.t1!wc1. and, su1Jscc1.-uo1ri;ly cJ.c2.1:c.d. n.t ~Iasdo House who~',. the TIB •.- I • • • mclntains c.n n.ccollirt lfoo 29178-c, On tno sc.mc, dcy_ 2notl1cr cheque of th-1 same number nnd sruno rn10L'X~ (:ili~hoP3) pu.rpol'tod to issue froli1 tho TIB, but it::i.s was peyablo to Hossrs. I·Ti~'ln:;i G<.nor:::1 Sn:_):_)lio::, ['J1d Cont::--c.c·~oro, a firm 1-r:·. lly 1 :,.~~-·1if;" . ~ - ,~, • ow11od by tho n.l)})Cll<:;rc. Accordin:':-,- -;;o -!;ho 11cmi ttnnce AdVioc (R;:.~1. P19) which accomprmicd ·;;::2is c:1oquc 9 nnd MCOJ~ding to_ the appcllmt himsolf,i t was an ad:tranoc p2.:rL1Jcn-l; :?or office stc:;ionory 11lld equipment ·i;o be supplied by the appol1Mt 1 s Zin11 to tho Tr-nsc.nia Imrootmcnt B: nk.. On 10.5.D5 the a,ppcllnnt proscn-!;ocl tho cheque r:.t I):.sc,lo !louse w11cro his fi:rm ;:1cint0,i11od an oocount No. 36325, ~)l:.-'c it wo.s rcjcc-i;ocl by tl1.o Ba.nk SupcrVisor, _ Cecilia Malwngoro ( P:~10); 1(10 ro-t·J.:·ncd i ·i; ·:::o t:10 D..ppcllr-c1t ,·Ti tl1 ::-..n cnclorscmont - 1 st dJ:'awor 's oicn2,·~L·J:·c o.if:fc::rs". 11 :Uoiicvor~ the. nozt da.y t:_1c c..1)pcllru1t presented the choquo Dt,'-:::.in ::-::.1c1 ·c:1i ::J -time it uc,s cloc..rod by FflO a.fte:r she had been Mau.red by the Bo.nlc I-1.".lit\;o;;.' 9 Cletus Fgombcro ( Pr-r8) 7 fo2.t tJ.10 signr.:;;-_w.'CS hncl been vorif'iod.. I• Indood PWlO l'..llc 0 dc -:;.'.,.~-i; even en -~:.'.:c :,_1rcv'ious dcy ,.;ho c.ppc:.J.::n-t ucs introduced to her by Mr. It;o;·.1:)c.ro .-r.".:o o.s~~ccl :::.c.x ,.;o t~ssist him. In hi:3 oVic:J.cnce, howaver1 Bo tll2..t 0,3 it mo..:.': tho t'..ppcllont proooadcd to withdrn.-1 360,000/= 0~1 -~::.t s~'.I.:c 0cc-2,r.ion, i.e. 11.5.85~ c..nrJ. smcllar .-rithdrrlrols ..folloued in quic:: nuccc,:;.:i:n., ::Lc ::.·r:. . 1t"~ bccnnw obvious lr.° .011 sor.icone in the 1 posti°ng soc'tio:.1 c:~ :b::£.0 ~:c:_:c;G qu.. ::::-i, - tl:,u ,:~'!:l::ionco of t:1-' Dr.l1.l::: ::~or I s sigl'l<.'1.turc on t~ie c'..ioriuo. L::',::,are:.:tl,7 ::. -~ l1ad to be ondorsccl b:1l bo·c:1 FtflO e1ncl Ju-. Mgomborc. P:ao -t.'.1,,:•/or,, tool~ ·:.\c cl-:.cquc to Hr. i'Jgorrtborc io::. endorsement h .bu.t ho dcclinecl. Irn:r'.io;.-._c~ l::.c .:;u.c,,__ ,o:, cd ~ -:-,11.~0ct,in. Invc3tme11t Bc.-u1k o:'. ::icio..ls as uell Investment R"..nl::: ofl'i:Jie:.l;., (.:.:.z;:;c,ci.:.;~ucl t··:cmselves from the cheque !Thilo the t i;i,ppolhnt mcin,Jdnocl t.:,.D,-c the c!1c~1t:•.:- W.:1.8 deli vorcd to him by one : Itnmbi who had negotiated tho Olll)Pl~r of :::t~·.-:;ioncr:~ ::J.1cl office equipment. Ile wr.:i led to the T,mzonio. Invest::ion-li Bc..11lc o:':?:l.oos ~J!'.t !1c )ould not point to this i:Go.nbie ~o mn.tter wc.s rc:for::-ocl fo -c::c :;::ic:li"c ·f:o ov· ntu..c..lly chnrged tho c..prc 11.mrt o.s st.:.v~od boforc. In his dofc11c0 ~.;110 ,,i:)}''--::cJ:·;; ,_;·c::-;~o: ·cJ:w.t on 19.4.85 he ware, -visi tcd by Mtmnbi who cskocJ. fo:r e:, Profor.iilo. Ir:voico ::--,:c· the supply of s·btio:-1:. ":Y and other oquj.praont to iGhe f;::.in:::;ru.1io. I:cvcs·c;·.,or.:c :&,,1:.:-~. He prepcxod -'cuo invoin( s one (E:d1,P.20) dr_:co6. 17.4.85 (i/'c~ ·:,;~u C>.:rs b ?ore i'Hni-:1bi 1s Visit) f01 ')08,400/ci nnd tho other (n::.~1.P21) do.tee::. 19,.4-. J5 for 30.3,000/= a.nd gr::.ve tl10n t, Mtarabia S01i1otiu1e in Ney Etc..:1bi hcr)t,;_)1t >2.:.1 ··.:~.__ co1~t:ro,;·orsicl choqt.i.o (Ed1. f ~: clang With ·the Rcr.ti. t·t""1ce AdVicc (~::.i.1:., Pl:)). S}l1c. tri.:::.l com,t notocl 1 l:.ouc -c t' 7 that . Ex:h.Pl.9 was de.too. 19, 3.85., -~:io.t ir.; 1 ,_._ 1;~.,olo nonth before the 0llog~ i Visit by Mti::.wbie And i-~ uiJ.l bo rccdloC.. the,·;; t:.to cheque wn.s itself de:,k !_ 9.4.85, that is1 ten cl0Jro 1)c1ore tllc n.l10:3·or:'. Vioit bj,~ that ;:ic.n_ The n.p1)olL ~ 'G wont on to sriy thr.:.t u:.w;,1 t.'.10 c:.10quo WG.::::; TeJocted on 1005.85 lle uro·~o ·~o t· ., To.nznnia. Investnent Bnnl:: co;;1plcini:ng .:mcl 1;-it!:d.n G. ::1attor of thrco hou.rs ritonb:, .;urnod ♦ 0 • • /3 t.1-ic n.ppollcnt t:10 lollouine di:fJT 1:!icn ·:;;20 c.ppollr-.nJ" uont to prcso;.1-c it agD.in n.t l'fu.sdo .Rouoo. BuJ.; ro,\(i:;:ig tl:c cv-iLlcmcc of FJlO botwoon tho lines, nnd according to the ·b.:ic..l ;.1;.~g·L:riirc·:;c ~~-·. 0 sc,u tho s2no, t::..o c1.wqt~c bore no onond,,,, 1 wont. Tho 1:'..l:,pollciY~_ -~-~once ~lonicc'.. ·cllo c:.:i.c.rgcc n.n(L cl2iacC. t~:i.2:i; tho choquo was '" bona, fide p~::·;·_1()1~t lor, go?ds j~o oo c"'.. oh vcrod, Ho olcit1Cci. t::i.r-.t 110 used tho 3~0,000/= t_o pu.rc.~,-~~-e ·i;l:o.:J gooc.ls o:;:el_o:r·ccl. 2-..i.1Cl st.::~cd tb.nt tho 'l12l1Z2.i.riv.. Invcstocnt ., rcfusccl ci.cJ.ivor_~- ,-r:.1cn j~ho chcc~1.:c l)l'oblcns cropped up. B.'1nk }:o gc,vo the inprossion tl:-.c;i; ·i;l10 gooc:s were s-!iill lying at lris pronisos. i · Tllo ·lcc.:c;.1cc;_ Sc:.rioJ: Rm3iclc:1t H:-cistxn.to .found thri.·~ :t.'.-.e chcq_1.tc Er..h.P3 W"'....S a f o:r;gcry0 I·i; ccrt,:~i:1l~r was,. T.b.e:1'0 1rc..s o:-:p0rt .hcndwri ti:c1g ovic.:cmcc which the r.1ngis"iirp.tc believe~:, .:-..n(:. I ht.,vo' no cr:.L'.::JC -i;o offer n, c.li:ffc1·c1rt vimt, that the pu;rportcd sign;:-;i;LU'cs on ·i;;_10 c:1oqt,o b~r 'l'anz~nia Invcstncnt Bn.nlc officicls, RT4 and PW5, wore for[:;·orioa. The two_ o:?/icials ~.lso d.is·ow11od tho signa.turcs•· Porhc'.l.ps_ the ~.,or;t prossi110 quesJcion is ul20tl1cr the appall ·:..n·i; wc.,s r,.,ssociatod with ·!;110 forgery. T:10 lor:l'ncc~ ~.12--gist~r.-i;c Cf,"D.-i-11 found thn;t he .-r:i..s-, and I scy tha:t sho ·wo.s ~mtitlod to i'i1if1. so~ In scy"'ine so,_·I clo~;ro _to clcc:l' 'L'-."? 0110 rao/.;tcr. Tho trin.l t1r.gistrr,·;;o_ seabed to waver c'..S to 'vJhothor tho ci1cq1-i_c u. ~s issued by Tt>Jlzc.nia Invostwm·~ 11.::.nlc offieic1ls o:r ,-rhothcr tho u-ppollc1n·i; 0..0·0 l ;.1croly in collusion ui J~h -~wa. ~o clcf'cnco coLmscl c'..t tho trial n.ncl iI:i:. :, L,ira. boforo no r.1ai11tai-nod tl:.<'..·i; tho cb.oqu.c w2,s ism.co. by Tn.11z2.nic, Invos-c:.1011·;; :3::-nk officials.. In my m:n:.1ind;ion oi -~110 cviclc;1cc, I find ·the contcnJ.;ion jL1.o·Jif:. )d. F.i.rstly, ulloqor prcpc..:rcc-:.. -~:io o:ioquc socns -~o :11.v-c b(;Gi.1 QWn.t'o o:2 ·the J"JI'O J :-:i.'C.:~ion of o. sir.ti.lor ·cl:cquo :fo1• tho Troaou.ry. .i.cco:;:ch113 to P::3 the pr-occsG : )l' the prcpn.rr:liion of tho- Trcasu:ryrs clicquo cor:::-.101100 011 :I·'.J.2,.85. It is then :;.1otd tlmt tho 1.·~ Ro,·.u.. t-'-\IQ.1100 ....1 dVJ.CC . ' . ' .O,CCOi"Jp.:::.11,;·:. w~uo~1 . . 1 ·.;.w " .:i.ppo lJ.&it 1 s C1lGCf1..'.C ' ' ' 19 • 3 • 85 ' iTC.,J (. ''.:\iau. thn.t is, n. dr:-y lr.:~o::-, .?.,,f1J. the cho-;1..W i t-:wlf Wet,S issued on the 1 t.i'Jcdcy as tho Troaau:ry''s choc1uc .. Secondn.ly, it ,,c:s not ::lispukd thd ·i;!1l .1c;:1ittenc9 AdVico n.forcscic.l c~.1c.nc;~ocl fron tl:..e Tl'..nz:-;.1i2. Invostncnt R~1!:,:.. 1 ~ Wc\.S stated cy P!f4, c:inc.l I q'c:o·~c, 11:J;::11.F.1.9 is ro.::i·i;tc. 1cc rclcl'.l1ce ( ?). I·i; xc1, ;.1blcs thct of Tnnzani{:'.. Lwostncnt :.!Jc1-1i!c issue(:'. !)jr Ilr Th-,G.nn., but I hc.vc :no·i; < .< ::i,l t with it." Thirdly, n.l·i;'..l.ouc:1 HT4 ·c.ncl P.'75 clo~1L:l the siJ'lrn.turos on t:10 :: 1oquc, and f ouncl support in t:10 hc..:.1c~wri ii;1g ov'idcncc, they concoclcd tJ.1c.:'.; tho i, signatures appeurod or pt:rpoi~tccl to be their m-ni. I~ rcquirocl so;:100;.10 no·~ m :; 7 with aocosa to the bru1kls clocuacn-ts but o.lso Tiell l1tt.b: tun.tad to thcso of:Zicic'..'.. 3 1 signatures to be c1blo to ,.1C.:.:c such soc;:ur1gly pox:bct ir.1i tn.tionsc In r.iy 'View, · hcrcforo, there was circtt:1stC'...11tial avid.once o:t n, na.-turo th1:'..t irrcsisJ.;i 1)1.y poJ r. tod to the conclusion thv..·~ t:.10 c:1oquo issuoc~ :i:r-on JQo offices of tho Ci:r:.;.izc-..niv.. '.: vestnont a--m.1c. ...... /4 .,,. " ~ : 4 g That sc:icl, t:10L'.g21, I :find untc;112,0lo tho n.rgllinont tlmt the appellant hnd no-'Gh:\.ng to do witl2 t:lC J.01"gory. LJ observed by tho lec,rnod Senior Resident l\fo.gistrato, the o.,ppollr-nt ':·T0s not su:rprisci:l whe:n he wo.s gi vcn c c!'l.equo antedating his nllcg-cd ;;1oct;inJ wit:). I-1t2abi; he was not surprisccl. tha/G the Remi ttancc Ar.lVicc oocompnnyi1;; sn;·,10 uo..s elated even much 02.rlicr, indood he wo..s not surprisec: t::o..'li those doc1,1·.1onts wore m::1cle out in hie firm.-':: name before ho ha.cl hO,Cl a.l.1,Y' contc.ct wi tJ.2 H-~uii1bi. Tho only ron.so:·X1,ble conolusion ia tlm-t ho was involvccl ~rom tho boci11:.ri.:..1B·, long before ho propr..rcd -~he invoices, oarlior tho.n tho n.J.logccl Vioi t b.:r .m;cr11bi. Thr.: prcpnr2.;cion of the invoices was pa.rt of the enterprise. liurt.:.101'i,!Ol'O, when the choqu.Q 1'7['..S first rejected he was content oclmly to :p:roocnt it; .:-. :;·mn wi tl1 all its imper.f'oc·;;ions. That it .nov wont tb.roL\g.~ shows the e;-:tcnt ._.f the conspiracy. F:i.11<."',ll.71 he li toro.lJ.y pounood on r..lt10s-'i; r..ll the r.:oncy tl1:.1t ·/ic cheque reprosontocl ;;rt ·t:..o vory moment that i·~ u~s l)[>..ssed. T'.acsc fac·>)rs justified the -liri0,l mncistrcto in finding tha.t tl10 .:ippollmit wn.o c p~•t? to the mo.king of J:;ho chcc; :r.o; and thoro wt1.s justifior..tion 101· convic•:inc hira 0:1 count one ho.ving regartl t.o tho provisions -of S.22 (b) of J11l10 Ponr..l Codeg Q£_op£,:o. Hri.lter v.R. 1977 LRT n.5? (198O)TLR 313." It only OCOl'..!'G to ;.10 to· :;oir:[; ou·~· -!illa;t tho porticuln:i:s oi :,lfonce in com1t one did no-Ii n.llcgo 8ll intention to dcf:r:· ..~u.cl or to deceive. There c..re a.uthoritios here Md there lT:.1icl1 hold t~t a ob.ergo of f~1·:.,·-,r;/ mus·~ ['..llc;'.1·~ , t, intention to dofra.ud or to clco'.Ji vo, -::1ml .:f;eto.l consoi:t,:onccs :1i'."..'rc froquc11Uir :-;,;·condod tho omission. I ·'·'l.4i.,.._.,w,_, 1 i~• 1 •· J..' t'··~,·'· -::'•.u."'C· ,...,., ...,,iot be 0, h".rc.1 ··:r: ',r, ·:evc"' •••..,II• 7 ,,.!1,.. ·" 1 (; I'ulo in tho· .1.J,(, ~• CJ V- ,ll., •..LJ,,1,.,. C. .... Ll .. ._ mn:~tor a.s, ul I.I.a:.!!1..,·'·0 .1 • .; .. ·;~ell c~c..-v... o ,1.H.,.., ,.,c., 1J..J'•~ 1 Uc... 'Y'lr·•'·V ·"'c· J·uc1,.,.cd <~ • 0·1 .1. 1· t"' •,;;, f•,c-!-" J.J .. t.,_. ->,.>, ~r,.:,1co, there is _!...also pors\.W.sivc t'.u:;.'..wri ty for the pr0po:::;:i •~ion t~1:1.t where tlw nt,/co;'.1c.nt of off(:;i.11 oocuro,tcly so·~s OLtt ·tlw of:l:'cncc bL!t -~:i.u : ::.rticulnrs. of 0f':.::'c11cu c;:i. ·?; rm csscnticl. ing:roclicnt thorco:Z, tho o;.1i S'.Ji 01:. j:c s ::o·c rc~Klor t:1c r.:.;." J.'gc b2.(1, h:t. sLnply ~ f CC t l.VO C1,C · ·.. , " 1 :.,,1:... J. f ·'·!t,.l ... ~-~ or J..:lpcr:cCCu --, ,,.J. .... ... :·CT.~Osl ,:..!.,~ • , ..... ·· 1S •· :, · .. ~-·· C.1.)Q...~,.;f.'.L· a.t,1,• ··· '. ..,.,..,.,,. .. or · ,,-i ProJ'11 diccd +11c-·.1.~c 1v:r "'L10!1 def· \,V~·1,'· 1' r• , .•.• ,,.~)l··, "-'\ V. ~' l;.;I .. •• T:, ·t'•,·· P,,-,,1· c,}, C" .... ~ < 1· -...:!:.!.....! .J :) V ·• '- ... ,.... ,...... --· ··-'-- J..J..... J _ ~.. '-•"'.;)\,; . ~,T-V:' t · C ( 1960) 2 .,n -~J ♦ ~,J:I.• _.49•~..,), J.,, J.'·W. l, l .&.-1,,N .. '.,,.....·.11 n:__.., v.,.c· ......... · ,-1- \,.,,·.::.J ·•~"' .; ,,,,.: ·,'~·C-• · ;:. . ,,,,,, 0-. ,, ...,.: .... • \'1) .. 0 f ..1.,J. ... --~........ l,,,... \.. ... tho :El=plosivo St.1brr:;<'..'..:cv:; •.ct, 1,3Ci3, ·:t:.:ioL: •-~"'-c:'.c i"t L, fc:i.011,;r for-'· 1:'son "kl1owi11gly" "i;o :.1.,wo in :1is posscs::::io:1 2-11 ccplozivo su'bsk:1co i:'1 lX - iculn.r oirou.-nstmiocs. '.l1hc pc.r·!iiculn:rs cf cflc:,.cc· c.:1i t·~ccl th:: ..rorc.1. 1110.1011i:?, L.;.r". n,·,on \Jl-' crnvi· • cti· 011• ····,c v_. '...,,JT'lulla.i.~~- ---'. . ~·ppc...,lc-''. .i;· (.. • 'J ( • ., <..,1 \.... ,J:·, ...... ·.·,u v. .. I.A.;......... .;.•,,.,t -·"rc:i-··· v ... J.c..... t:J.,..1 0 1·.,,,,,; • ....,_ c --,c·1t ,J w.as ,l. bw-;1 and that he hC!.Cl 1)00;:: crrc.,ic:1c'. c.n [~ .:.r.:~:-,:::istc1·'~ cl':::'cnce. 'E.1c . :. ll't of Crimi•:inl J. c_.., ~pp~-1 ""CJ·roJ.od. 4• IJ \,,t,,1 W,.,..,. ..,,.1c-··'· :-,1.=•;.,., -t·.,_1c c.,..,..._,,., -' J ~ --.- .. ...:,.i, (".,_ ;' t·-,..._.l. 1 ..... tl1ot:1.c-h '"b.,.,. ·'·'1n y• l"d 1_........... -- V ...l t.v V U. V •• ,J 11 11 knowingly s!·:oulc.l hc.ve been inclLt-•-- '. ::..!1 the pn.rticu.l.::i.rs of -~he offc::. :-::.1, its omission dic1 not ac}::o -~.'10 indict::iu2·~ br..d lJ:../:i 0~1l,7 J.o:fccti vc or iaporfc.~ t; nnd, (ii) that lo1ouloc\--~·~, uhic:.• w:::.::: .::.:1 ossc,:ti~.1 L1g:::-odicnt of the offo.co, was estc::.bli shccl ,,t ~...120 tr:. ;:-.1, c::::, c:.s :.10 0;:,j[.l,rI'.:1.sc::-,c1·: t or prcjuc1ioc h.nd. boon Cfl scd to tho ".nnoll···,·'· '·• ·'·'·:·. r--· ~-.., ,,., 11 J\,\ \.._ J; vJ.-,. -:··· '-'• •·,.. ••- V '.·,~c~• ·.J\.• · •-·• --,o .,-- -:.to. i.;. "'L,'us·'·",,·'.·i· ...,1 -. •• ..l • 0 -· ._. --.. Ii.> ,. Vt.,. __ ,._ U LI,, ' 5 mifuc&""riagc o::: ~,·.::r:;ico. Aftur o·:)sor·v--:L;1g tb.1:-c-;; tho indictrn0a·~ ot~J.orffise set out the o:Z::Ciloeo i::.COt.'..I'atoly, -;;}_1.0 Com't sto:kcl t.l::.2-i:; tho c_[l:cr.:r~io;1 .raised in the appc2..l u2,G n.1ot 0::.1 tho basi::: -~:,.t:~ the ihdictr:1en·~ c:iscloooC:. no offence lmown bu·;; -;;;:rn:;; it clooc:'i bed a ~mcr,;·~1 o:C:'?0:100 wi Jc.:1 i:;.1complu·cc 1x•..:;.,·~icu.lars. 11 T:J.is decision u<.·.o :2olloHod. by tllc, :'.:.-i[}l Coui·Jc of Ugancl~ ii.1 .~o_;:i_W-·~r Opale I~a.wo v.R. (1962) ~~.::... 661, w;J.icll :.:clcl ·&.12.t a similm· omission uns a curn.blo defeoJ.; wider s. 331 o-Z Uf:.-;,ncln_"s C1'i ..1i:.:,:;.,l Proce-:1u:rG Code. In tho in:T~,.a-:; cc.so t.1.10 stc;co.-.10:r~ of of:Zonco nccurc;;;oJ.7 c7.oscri bee. the offimco n.s xcqt!il'ocl ;Yy s.135 (o..) (ii) o~ t:.io Crimi1tcl.,_?r909.:":.ui,o Act. 1985, but -...1. 1 -:.[_,-..:. :::.:.1 111"uCl1 u10.l 1,0 ' -'me pf:\rticulc:cs 01 o:Z:: 0.1cc: omittoc1. t.ol.o:i'..'rn.ud ox to decei vc.· I •;;;:rink: that tho omis·sion did no·~ ;i1n,.'..;:o the charge a bC!d chn.rgo 1 but sL;1)l: c. ci.cfoctivo or 0 imporfoct one. In I!cVi"'cio the Com··t o:i: Cximilml Appcc.l s:·~_c:. -~~1.:-.t r,.. boo chc.rge would be one clisclooii.~ no off once l;:;.10-:-r;.1 to the lt?r, for c:;.:,:'..i".lplo .-rhorc it we..s ldd 1.u10.or r-.. sJ.;[',;~u-;;ci 1rllich J.100 boc:.;, :cc ;c,:,.,lod nnd not ro-on-::c·tcc~1 In tho Ct:'..Be before mo, :forc;a1~y io D.J.l off once unclo:i:, ·;;_j_o lr.w m1cl t:.10 isc1.10_, -~~io:re:forc, is not tlin."'li the cilir-.riS·c d.ooclosod no la1own oil• -.:100 but -chc1.t i JG clcc.c:ci ~Jed r... !01ow11 off cnoo 1-ri t!1 incomplo·~c pc:,:;:,·~iculr.-,rs. If -;;.~10 r,p:_)ollon-li uns no-b om")c.::rc.ssccl or prejudiooc1 by -~J.).o omission tho dci'od~ i;.i CUI't'.,blc. I :.1c,ve no .:.:..csi· ;.:-.Uon in seying that .,:.o u.::.s no·~ embn.rrnssed.. He wr:.s mrnxc thc.t ho uc.s 1·oc~uirod to dofond ~ainst ru1 i1rtcn·~. ·:;o defraud or -'co C'..occi vo for the wlwlo sc.'.20ac o:-! his def anco was gccll."od c.t s;.J.m-Ti:.l[:;' t:1.;.,_t llc w2..s r.. 1)onc:. fide recipient oi -;;;_20 c~... a~(Uc pursuant to r.:, contrc,c·~- to supply goods to tho Tc.nr:;n.1u.n. Investment Bc.,;_l2.:. r·t is n.lso no.,ti ;,ri thoi.tt significr..i:100 -~h:1,t this issue uet.s aovor rriiscd by· lo,'.'.:l.'lwc:.. ,:·Jw1scl ai thcr c'..t tho trial o:r bc:7orc t;1is Court. In t:.:c circums·i;m1cc:s, ·c:2io i;;; ::. proper ons~ in whioh to i:i,ppli; ·c:.,.c provisions of s. 3813 of the Criiilinc..l Procc~~rr__, Act. I11 doing so, I suir;;:'.in J-;;10 conviction 011 cotnt one. !11hc rcr11ci1rl11C;· cou;.1ts pr<.?scn-'i; 110 pxo:,lcm. In connection ui-'. 1 -'.;!10 second nccount, there uc..s ·:.:ic r..ppollnnt'o own "~.c1;:.~;::;;:;ion of prc;--;c::·i;L<;· ·i;~c · ..1oquc ;t Mo.ado Rouse, 'Em o1fcmcc of ut·i;crin(;;· i :· r::on::-+.;_-:u.ted bir ~J.1oiiineJ.1 .:\ild. tho samo mus·b be a.if1:!.:i.'o of its fc..lsi·~i-· ~·-:.K:.. :·. : ..:t .,c... int0ndi:1f,· to i.u u.co someone to Mt tt1tliis c'lotrimcnt. T:20 cv:i.fa ,. : ~.--:-:..-- .- : :-i:::vim-rccl liv no dou.bt tho.t the n!)pollt,nt uttered the.; 1c1,l::;c ·. ·•" r-:u.c !u-.mrinc,;l;:,r c..;_icl fl':o l .lcntl.y11 1 Tho conv'i,ction on 001.-ui-b tr-ro is simil:-..:rl~;r suct:.i1::.:d. As rogm•do COUllJv three, it 1TC'-S c..::,·;:,,in CO,,1,;10::. C,'TOWlC..'. -i;J.,.c_:~ -~:i(; ::-::: ~ .h:nt ob·~~nod the .360, ooo/cs chc..rgcd CJ.1;2. OV0ll Hore. It W.'.1.C ,.,lso not i:a di;, ·l to thc.t a.t tb.o r.m"iie~ial "iiiijlC he 112.Cl no·;; snp1Jlic-c.:. :.n:r goo, . . ::, to -~11e Tr.J.1s.:::1.: 1 ..... /6 " g 6 g Investment Bc..nk,. Tho tric.l i:10,,:p_strr-.:~o tllon fow1d, cllld ! %'"Too, -~llnt tho o,ppollont 112d ho·~ ·noccl tho i:tonoy to purchase tho goot.ls a.s- c.,llo[;'cd by him. 'I think it ur..o no·t requiring '..1.i:,1 to ostc.blish his im10co11cc if l10 hn.cl tendered the goods L1 cvic"'.011cc, o.nd he hCJ.l c..11 tho tir:10 to do so sir:.co ho wo.s throughout on bail., The trLr~li of tho m::i.ttcx is tl'.'.;:,,;t there were no suc:i [;'Oods, olld there could not hn.vc bec-n r-.,.,.,y1 for th(; 1-t::wlc cff air wc1s a frri,udulc11t enterprise. I sustoin the- conviction on count three. The entire a.pper-.1 thus fcila :··ml.. it is so dismss8d,. DJffi ES s1~L.f.,..;'J:I 10/9/90 Mr. Mro.ro.. for Appellr-.nt Mr. Mngom['. for Republic.