haruni ramadhani migire vs ministry of defence attorney general 2022 tzhc 14674 18 november 2022
Applicant failed to account for the period of delay with sufficient material evidence. Illness was not adequately substantiated, and alleged illegality was not apparent or properly raised. The application was not brought expeditiously or in good faith.
- Citation
- haruni ramadhani migire vs ministry of defence attorney general 2022 tzhc 14674 18 november 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Haruni Ramadhani Migire; 1st Respondent: Minister of Defence and National Service; 2nd Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haruni Ramadhani Migire
Applicant
Minister of Defence and National Service
1st Respondent
Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has advanced sufficient reasons for delay to file leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal within time
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to account for the period of delay with sufficient material evidence. Illness was not adequately substantiated, and alleged illegality was not apparent or properly raised. The application was not brought expeditiously or in good faith.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment