HASH ENERGY T LTD VS RICHOL CO LTD MISC

HASH ENERGY T LTD VS RICHOL CO LTD MISC

The application for temporary injunction fails because the existence or whereabouts of the petroleum products is uncertain, making an injunction order nugatory. The loss, if any, is compensable by damages, and there is no irreparable harm. The balance of convenience does not favor granting the injunction, and the court cannot grant investigative orders at this stage.

Citation
HASH ENERGY T LTD VS RICHOL CO LTD MISC
Parties
Applicant: Hash Energy Tanzania Limited; 1st Respondent: Richol Company Limited; 2nd Respondent: Singida Copec Service Station; 3rd Respondent: KCB Bank Tanzania Limited; 4th Respondent: Khamis Maganga
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Case / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction and Related Interim Orders
Outcome
Application for temporary injunction and related orders dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Interlocutory Relief, Breach of Contract, Preservation of Property, Equitable Remedies
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Temporary Injunctions Interlocutory Relief Breach of Contract Preservation of Property Equitable Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hash Energy Tanzania Limited

Applicant

Richol Company Limited

1st Respondent

Singida Copec Service Station

2nd Respondent

KCB Bank Tanzania Limited

3rd Respondent

Khamis Maganga

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Commercial Case / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction and Related Interim Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the 4th respondent from disposing of or alienating petroleum products pending the main suit
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders for detention, preservation, and sampling of the petroleum products

Ratio Decidendi

The application for temporary injunction fails because the existence or whereabouts of the petroleum products is uncertain, making an injunction order nugatory. The loss, if any, is compensable by damages, and there is no irreparable harm. The balance of convenience does not favor granting the injunction, and the court cannot grant investigative orders at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application for temporary injunction and related orders dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for temporary injunction refused.
  • Orders for detention, preservation, and sampling of petroleum products dismissed.