hassan loan namagono others vs attorney general another 2015 tzhc 2087 14 december 2015
The applicants have demonstrated a serious triable issue and a likelihood of irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted, as demolition would destroy evidence and render compensation claims impossible if they succeed in the main suit. The balance of convenience favors the applicants.
- Citation
- hassan loan namagono others vs attorney general another 2015 tzhc 2087 14 december 2015
- Parties
- Applicant: Hassan Loan Namagono; Applicant: Haji Ajili Makoloko; Applicant: Saidi Magombo Mtaka; Applicant: Adija Matikika Kanjaba; Applicant: George Rapahel Binali; Applicant: Athmani Masudi Mtando; Applicant: Mohamed Bushiru Maulidi; Applicant: Mawazo Ahmadi Chambali; Applicant: Namele Mahamudu Bushiri; Applicant: Anthony Omari Sanane; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: The Regional Manager, Tanzania National Roads Agency
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction
- Outcome
- Injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Compensation for Land Acquisition, Irreparable Harm, Balance of Convenience
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hassan Loan Namagono
Applicant
Haji Ajili Makoloko
Applicant
Saidi Magombo Mtaka
Applicant
Adija Matikika Kanjaba
Applicant
George Rapahel Binali
Applicant
Athmani Masudi Mtando
Applicant
Mohamed Bushiru Maulidi
Applicant
Mawazo Ahmadi Chambali
Applicant
Namele Mahamudu Bushiri
Applicant
Anthony Omari Sanane
Applicant
The Attorney General
Respondent
The Regional Manager, Tanzania National Roads Agency
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an injunction restraining the respondents from demolishing their properties pending determination of the main suit
- 2 Whether the compensation paid was unfair and inadequate
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants have demonstrated a serious triable issue and a likelihood of irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted, as demolition would destroy evidence and render compensation claims impossible if they succeed in the main suit. The balance of convenience favors the applicants.
Court Disposition
Injunction granted
Orders
- Respondents are restrained from demolishing applicants' properties pending determination of the main suit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment