hassani yusuphu zogolo vs chacha mwenge and 2 others 2020 tzhclandd 3964 20 november 2020
The appellant failed to prove the existence and terms of the alleged oral agreement and did not establish entitlement to relief; the tribunal's decision was not based on the validity of the written agreement but on lack of proof of the oral contract.
- Citation
- hassani yusuphu zogolo vs chacha mwenge and 2 others 2020 tzhclandd 3964 20 november 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Hassani Yusuphu Zogolo; 1st Respondent: Chacha Mwenge; 2nd Respondent: Serikali ya Mtaa Tabata Kimanga; 3rd Respondent: Ilala Municipal Council
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Contract, Oral Vs Written Agreements, Evidence Admissibility
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hassani Yusuphu Zogolo
Appellant
Chacha Mwenge
1st Respondent
Serikali ya Mtaa Tabata Kimanga
2nd Respondent
Ilala Municipal Council
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an oral or written agreement between the parties
- 2 Whether the signatories had capacity to contract on behalf of local authorities
- 3 Whether the terms of the agreement entitled the appellant to a share of proceeds
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove the existence and terms of the alleged oral agreement and did not establish entitlement to relief; the tribunal's decision was not based on the validity of the written agreement but on lack of proof of the oral contract.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment