Misc
The delay was not inordinate and was caused by technical grounds; applicant acted promptly after appeal was struck out and upon receiving ruling. Technical delay is sufficient cause for extension of time.
- Citation
- Misc
- Parties
- Applicant: Hedwiga Herman Lorry; 1st Respondent: Al Sahi Investment Limited; 2nd Respondent: Abduel Gilead Kitururu T/A Amicus Attorneys; 3rd Respondent: Mak Auction Mart
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Technical Delay, Negligence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hedwiga Herman Lorry
Applicant
Al Sahi Investment Limited
1st Respondent
Abduel Gilead Kitururu T/A Amicus Attorneys
2nd Respondent
Mak Auction Mart
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal
- 2 Whether technical delay constitutes sufficient reason for extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The delay was not inordinate and was caused by technical grounds; applicant acted promptly after appeal was struck out and upon receiving ruling. Technical delay is sufficient cause for extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Extension of time to file appeal granted
- Applicant to file appeal within 14 days from date of ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment