henry luhunga vs pangea minerals ltd 2018 tzhc 2053 14 december 2018
Applicant failed to provide sufficient explanation and evidence for the two-year delay, did not account for each day, and did not establish good cause as required by law.
- Citation
- henry luhunga vs pangea minerals ltd 2018 tzhc 2053 14 december 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Henry Luhunga; Respondent: Pangea Minerals Limited
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision, Good Cause for Delay
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Parties
Henry Luhunga
Applicant
Pangea Minerals Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant established good and sufficient reasons for extension of time to file revision
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to provide sufficient explanation and evidence for the two-year delay, did not account for each day, and did not establish good cause as required by law.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment