heritage insurance company limited vs anna yonazi mfinanga others 2017 tzca 290 3 november 2017

heritage insurance company limited vs anna yonazi mfinanga others 2017 tzca 290 3 november 2017

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear for hearing despite being duly served with notice, in accordance with Rule 63(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.

Citation
heritage insurance company limited vs anna yonazi mfinanga others 2017 tzca 290 3 november 2017
Parties
Applicant: Heritage Insurance Company (T) Limited; 1st Respondent: Anna Yonazi Mfinanga; 2nd Respondent: Coca-Cola Kwanza Ltd.; 3rd Respondent: Innocent Mushi
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
3 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Dismissal for Non Appearance
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Dismissal for Non Appearance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Heritage Insurance Company (T) Limited

Applicant

Anna Yonazi Mfinanga

1st Respondent

Coca-Cola Kwanza Ltd.

2nd Respondent

Innocent Mushi

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application should be dismissed for non-appearance of the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear for hearing despite being duly served with notice, in accordance with Rule 63(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed under Rule 63(1) of the Rules.
  • The applicant shall pay costs to the 1st respondent.