19890718 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant was not a proper party to the suit and thus lacked locus standi. Even if the right party had filed, the application would have been time-barred. The supporting affidavit was also found to be insufficient.
- Citation
- 19890718 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Hermalaus Herman; Respondent: David Peter Sizya
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Ex Parte Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Appeal Procedure, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hermalaus Herman
Appellant
David Peter Sizya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had locus standi to appeal against the ex parte judgment
- 2 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed time
- 3 Whether the ex parte judgment should be set aside
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant was not a proper party to the suit and thus lacked locus standi. Even if the right party had filed, the application would have been time-barred. The supporting affidavit was also found to be insufficient.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to the respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment