hidaya omary vs rehema mamlay 2019 tzhclandd 58 20 september 2019

hidaya omary vs rehema mamlay 2019 tzhclandd 58 20 september 2019

The applicant failed to sufficiently account for the delay of over a year and did not show good and sufficient reasons for extension of time. Being a layperson and the death of her advocate are not acceptable excuses.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
hidaya omary vs rehema mamlay 2019 tzhclandd 58 20 september 2019
Parties
Applicant: Hidaya Omary; Respondent: Rehema M Amlay
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Court Decisions, Delay in Filing, Sufficient Cause
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Review of Court Decisions Delay in Filing Sufficient Cause

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hidaya Omary

Applicant

Rehema M Amlay

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for review

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to sufficiently account for the delay of over a year and did not show good and sufficient reasons for extension of time. Being a layperson and the death of her advocate are not acceptable excuses.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs