hidaya omary vs rehema mamlay 2019 tzhclandd 58 20 september 2019
The applicant failed to sufficiently account for the delay of over a year and did not show good and sufficient reasons for extension of time. Being a layperson and the death of her advocate are not acceptable excuses.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- hidaya omary vs rehema mamlay 2019 tzhclandd 58 20 september 2019
- Parties
- Applicant: Hidaya Omary; Respondent: Rehema M Amlay
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Review of Court Decisions, Delay in Filing, Sufficient Cause
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hidaya Omary
Applicant
Rehema M Amlay
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for review
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to sufficiently account for the delay of over a year and did not show good and sufficient reasons for extension of time. Being a layperson and the death of her advocate are not acceptable excuses.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment