abdul hilal ali vs h r n enterprises ltd branch 1997 tzhc 201 4 december 1997
The defendant did not file an application for leave to defend within the prescribed time, and no justifiable cause was shown for the delay. Therefore, judgment must be entered for the plaintiff as required by law.
- Citation
- abdul hilal ali vs h r n enterprises ltd branch 1997 tzhc 201 4 december 1997
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hilal Alt About; Defendant: H.R.M. Enterprises Ltd Branch
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application for Judgment Under Summary Procedure
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Leave to Defend, Default Judgment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hilal Alt About
Plaintiff
H.R.M. Enterprises Ltd Branch
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application for Judgment Under Summary Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant filed an application for leave to defend within the prescribed time under Order XXXV of the Civil Procedure Code
- 2 Whether judgment should be entered for the plaintiff due to defendant's failure to file the application
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant did not file an application for leave to defend within the prescribed time, and no justifiable cause was shown for the delay. Therefore, judgment must be entered for the plaintiff as required by law.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff under Order XXXV, Rule 2(a) as prayed, with the principal sum reduced to 25,000,000 Tanzanian Shillings due to partial payment by the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment