abdul hilal ali vs h r n enterprises ltd branch 1997 tzhc 201 4 december 1997

abdul hilal ali vs h r n enterprises ltd branch 1997 tzhc 201 4 december 1997

The defendant did not file an application for leave to defend within the prescribed time, and no justifiable cause was shown for the delay. Therefore, judgment must be entered for the plaintiff as required by law.

Citation
abdul hilal ali vs h r n enterprises ltd branch 1997 tzhc 201 4 december 1997
Parties
Plaintiff: Hilal Alt About; Defendant: H.R.M. Enterprises Ltd Branch
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
4 December 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application for Judgment Under Summary Procedure
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Leave to Defend, Default Judgment
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hilal Alt About

Plaintiff

H.R.M. Enterprises Ltd Branch

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Application for Judgment Under Summary Procedure

  1. 1 Whether the defendant filed an application for leave to defend within the prescribed time under Order XXXV of the Civil Procedure Code
  2. 2 Whether judgment should be entered for the plaintiff due to defendant's failure to file the application

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant did not file an application for leave to defend within the prescribed time, and no justifiable cause was shown for the delay. Therefore, judgment must be entered for the plaintiff as required by law.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff under Order XXXV, Rule 2(a) as prayed, with the principal sum reduced to 25,000,000 Tanzanian Shillings due to partial payment by the defendant.