hilda ado charle vs the permanent secretary ministry of defence and national service and another 2023 tzhc 23271 13 december 2023
The applicant failed to show reasonable or sufficient cause for the delay, did not account for the 18-year delay, and did not provide evidence in her affidavit to support her reasons. The legal requirements for extension of time were not met.
- Citation
- hilda ado charle vs the permanent secretary ministry of defence and national service and another 2023 tzhc 23271 13 december 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Hilda Ado Charle; 1st Respondent: The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Defence and National Service; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Limitation Period, Employment Termination, Exhaustion of Remedies
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hilda Ado Charle
Applicant
The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Defence and National Service
1st Respondent
The Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown reasonable or sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for leave for judicial review
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to show reasonable or sufficient cause for the delay, did not account for the 18-year delay, and did not provide evidence in her affidavit to support her reasons. The legal requirements for extension of time were not met.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment