hilda kanyamale vs emmanuel elisafi 2016 tzhc 2118 22 april 2016

hilda kanyamale vs emmanuel elisafi 2016 tzhc 2118 22 april 2016

The application was struck out because it was incompetent, having cited improper provisions of law, and the court cannot entertain an application that is not properly before it. The applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application in compliance with legal requirements.

Citation
hilda kanyamale vs emmanuel elisafi 2016 tzhc 2118 22 april 2016
Parties
Applicant: Hilda Kanyamale; Respondent: Emmanuel Elisafi
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
22 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Struck Out at Preliminary Stage
Outcome
Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Striking Out for Procedural Irregularity, Improper Citation of Law
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hilda Kanyamale

Applicant

Emmanuel Elisafi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Struck Out at Preliminary Stage

  1. 1 Whether the application should be withdrawn or struck out due to procedural irregularities and improper citation of law

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out because it was incompetent, having cited improper provisions of law, and the court cannot entertain an application that is not properly before it. The applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application in compliance with legal requirements.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Application struck out
  • Applicant at liberty to file a fresh application in compliance with the law