tanzania audio visual disributors association others vs honourable attorney general others 2018 tzhc 2937 27 march 2018
The court found that neither Regulation 4(1) nor 23 of the Films and Music Products (Tax Stamps) Regulations imposes compulsory membership with the 2nd respondent as a condition for licensing or tax stamps. The petitioners failed to provide sufficient particulars or evidence of compulsory membership being a regulatory requirement. Therefore, no constitutional rights were infringed by the Regulations or the respondents' actions.
- Citation
- tanzania audio visual disributors association others vs honourable attorney general others 2018 tzhc 2937 27 march 2018
- Parties
- Petitioner: Tanzania Audio Visual Distributors Association; Petitioner: Shirika la Kutetea Haki za Wasanii Tanzania; Petitioner: Jackline Aringo Odhiambo alias Jack Akinyi; Respondent: Honourable Attorney General; Respondent: Copyright Society of Tanzania; Respondent: Tanzania Revenue Authority
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Association, Right to Work, Copyright Regulation, Tax Stamps, Licensing Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tanzania Audio Visual Distributors Association
Petitioner
Shirika la Kutetea Haki za Wasanii Tanzania
Petitioner
Jackline Aringo Odhiambo alias Jack Akinyi
Petitioner
Honourable Attorney General
Respondent
Copyright Society of Tanzania
Respondent
Tanzania Revenue Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Films and Music Products (Tax Stamps) Regulations impose compulsory membership with the Copyright Society of Tanzania as a condition for licensing and tax stamps
- 2 Whether such compulsory membership violates Article 20(4) (freedom of association), Article 22(1) and Article 23(1)-(2) (right to work and remuneration) of the Constitution
- 3 Whether the acts of the respondents are ultra vires the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that neither Regulation 4(1) nor 23 of the Films and Music Products (Tax Stamps) Regulations imposes compulsory membership with the 2nd respondent as a condition for licensing or tax stamps. The petitioners failed to provide sufficient particulars or evidence of compulsory membership being a regulatory requirement. Therefore, no constitutional rights were infringed by the Regulations or the respondents' actions.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- Each party to bear its own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment