tanzania audio visual distributors association others vs honourable attorney general others 2018 tzhc 2938 27 march 2018
The court found that neither Regulation 4(1) nor 23 of GN No. 244 of 2013 imposes compulsory membership with the 2nd respondent as a condition for obtaining certificates of approval or tax stamps. The petitioners failed to provide sufficient particulars or evidence to support their allegations of compulsory...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- tanzania audio visual distributors association others vs honourable attorney general others 2018 tzhc 2938 27 march 2018
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Tanzania Audio Visual Distributors Association; Petitioner: Shirika la Kutetea Haki za Wasanii Tanzania; Petitioner: Jackline Aringo Odhiambo alias Jack Akinyi; Respondent: Honourable Attorney General; Respondent: Copyright Society of Tanzania; Respondent: Tanzania Revenue Authority
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Association, Right to Work, Copyright, Taxation of Artistic Works
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Tanzania Audio Visual Distributors Association
Petitioner
Shirika la Kutetea Haki za Wasanii Tanzania
Petitioner
Jackline Aringo Odhiambo alias Jack Akinyi
Petitioner
Honourable Attorney General
Respondent
Copyright Society of Tanzania
Respondent
Tanzania Revenue Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Films and Music Products (Tax Stamps) Regulations, GN No. 244 of 2013, require compulsory membership with the Copyright Society of Tanzania as a condition for obtaining tax stamps
- 2 Whether such requirement, if it exists, infringes the right to freedom of association under Article 20(4) of the Constitution
- 3 Whether the acts of the respondents infringe the right to work and to receive just remuneration under Articles 22(1) and 23(1)-(2) of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that neither Regulation 4(1) nor 23 of GN No. 244 of 2013 imposes compulsory membership with the 2nd respondent as a condition for obtaining certificates of approval or tax stamps. The petitioners failed to provide sufficient particulars or evidence to support their allegations of compulsory membership or infringement of constitutional rights. Therefore, there was no violation of the right to freedom of association or the right to work and remuneration.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- Each party to bear its own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment