20061110 TZHC Arusha

20061110 TZHC Arusha

The application is time barred as there is no evidence the applicant became aware of the proceedings after the certificate was issued. The supporting affidavit is incurably defective as it is based on hearsay and does not comply with Order XIX Rule 3(1).

Citation
20061110 TZHC Arusha
Parties
Applicant: Humphrey Herman Mosha; 1st Respondent: Kigeri Estate Limited; 2nd Respondent: Paul M. Lyimo; 3rd Respondent: The Commissioner for Lands; 4th Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
10 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Application
Outcome
Application struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Affidavit Requirements, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Humphrey Herman Mosha

Applicant

Kigeri Estate Limited

1st Respondent

Paul M. Lyimo

2nd Respondent

The Commissioner for Lands

3rd Respondent

The Attorney General

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Application

  1. 1 Whether the application is time barred
  2. 2 Whether the supporting affidavit is defective
  3. 3 Whether the applicant can be joined as a co-defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The application is time barred as there is no evidence the applicant became aware of the proceedings after the certificate was issued. The supporting affidavit is incurably defective as it is based on hearsay and does not comply with Order XIX Rule 3(1).

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs

Orders

  • Affidavit in support of the application struck out
  • Application struck out for being time barred and not accompanied by a valid affidavit