hussein mnyama vs chairman of lupiro and another 2020 tzhclandd 95 6 april 2020

hussein mnyama vs chairman of lupiro and another 2020 tzhclandd 95 6 april 2020

Applicant was within the statutory period to appeal after obtaining judgment copies; application for extension was premature and lacked sufficient cause.

Citation
hussein mnyama vs chairman of lupiro and another 2020 tzhclandd 95 6 april 2020
Parties
Applicant: Hussein Mnyama; 1st Respondent: Chairman of Lupiro; 2nd Respondent: Nassoro Mcharange
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
6 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Appeals Limitation of Actions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hussein Mnyama

Applicant

Chairman of Lupiro

1st Respondent

Nassoro Mcharange

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient reasons for extension of time to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant was within the statutory period to appeal after obtaining judgment copies; application for extension was premature and lacked sufficient cause.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is struck out
  • Applicant to pay costs