ibrahim ally mpore vs capital development authority 2016 tzhc 2305 4 october 2016

ibrahim ally mpore vs capital development authority 2016 tzhc 2305 4 october 2016

The applicant established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored him as the holder of the certificate of title seeking renewal. However, the alleged loss was not irreparable as it could be compensated by damages. Nonetheless, the court found the balance of convenience in favor of the applicant and granted the temporary injunction for six months.

Citation
ibrahim ally mpore vs capital development authority 2016 tzhc 2305 4 october 2016
Parties
Applicant: Ibrahim Ally Mpore; Respondent: Capital Development Authority
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
4 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Misc. Land Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunction, Land Ownership, Certificate of Occupancy, Balance of Convenience
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Temporary Injunction Land Ownership Certificate of Occupancy Balance of Convenience

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Ally Mpore

Applicant

Capital Development Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Land Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from reallocating the disputed plots should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored him as the holder of the certificate of title seeking renewal. However, the alleged loss was not irreparable as it could be compensated by damages. Nonetheless, the court found the balance of convenience in favor of the applicant and granted the temporary injunction for six months.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Temporary injunction restraining the respondent from reallocating the disputed plots for six months
  • Each party to bear its own costs