Misc
The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for delay based on technical delay in pursuing the appeal and supported medical grounds, as evidenced by medical reports. The delay was therefore excusable.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- Misc
- Parties
- Applicant: Ibrahim Ally Yusuph Mpore (Administrator of the Estate of the Late Salum Ally Yusuph Mpore); 1st Respondent: Nalgis Ally Yusuph Mpore; 2nd Respondent: Rahmat Ahmad Juma
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Technical Delay, Medical Grounds for Delay
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ibrahim Ally Yusuph Mpore (Administrator of the Estate of the Late Salum Ally Yusuph Mpore)
Applicant
Nalgis Ally Yusuph Mpore
1st Respondent
Rahmat Ahmad Juma
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file a notice of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for delay based on technical delay in pursuing the appeal and supported medical grounds, as evidenced by medical reports. The delay was therefore excusable.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant is given fourteen days from the date of the ruling to file a notice of appeal against the impugned decision.
- No order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. LAND APPLICATION NO. 26454 OF 2023 (Arising From Land Case No. 175 of 2011, Land Division) IBRAHIM ALLY YUSUPH MPORE (Administrator of the Estate of the Late Salum Ally Yusuph Mpore).......................................... APPLICANT VERSUS NALGIS ALLY YUSUPH MPORE............................................... 1st RESPONDENT RAHMAT AHMAD JUMA........................ 2nd RESPONDENT RULING 7th to 27th March, 2024 E.B. LU VAN DA, J The Applicant above named is seeking for an order for extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal against the judgment of this Court dated 12/05/2016 in the above matter. In the affidavit in support, the Applicant grounded technical delay while taking essential steps to appeal and thereafter prosecuting Civil Appeal No. 83 of 2018 which was struck out by the Court of Appeal on 27/04/2021 following concession of his lawyer that it was filed out of time. He pleaded medical ground, arguing after striking out of his appeal he was attending i clinic at Temeke Municipal Hospital, as per annexure IM-6 and Muhimbili National Hospital, as per annexure IM-7. The First Respondent, opposed the application by filing a counter affidavit, stating that the medical chits attached have failed to account or show if the Applicant was sick between 27/04/2021 when the impugned decision was struck out to 30/11/2023 when the present application was filed. She stated that failure to file notice was occasioned by negligence and inaction on the part of the Applicant. The Applicant submitted that after the Civil Appeal was struck out, he made various efforts to seek other remedies, arguing it was unfortunately, was halted by sickness and he asserted to have been attended at Temeke Municipal Hospital and later referred to Muhimbili National Hospital for further treatment. He submitted that in consideration of records of proceedings which were before this Court, there is clearly an arguable case on appeal. The Respondents did not file a reply. On my part, in consideration of the reasons for the delay submitted by the Applicant to wit technical delay in both taking essential steps to appeal for 2 and in pursuit of Civil Appeal No. 83 of 2018 which was later struck out on 27/04/2021 by the Court of Appeal. And in view of the ground of ailment which was supported by the medical report from Muhimbili National Hospital where in a report dated 5/06/2023 two Urologist Specialist unanimously opined that the Applicant was first seen at urology clinic in May 2003, and presented with complaint of loin pain which has been on/off with no associated nausea or vomiting. I hold the view that the delay by the Applicant was well grounded The Applicant is given a period of fourteen days to file a notice of appeal against the impugned decision, which will count from the date hereof. The Application is granted. No order for costs.