83
- Citation
- 83
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 11 November 2024
- Posture
- Misc. Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 11 November 2024
- Posture
- Misc. Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant demonstrated good cause for delay as he was in prison and received the High Court order late, circumstances beyond his control, justifying extension of time.
Court disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The applicant is to file a notice of intention to appeal and the appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania within 30 days from the date of this Ruling.
02
Material facts
Parties
Ibrahim Mundo
ApplicantThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Ms. Upendo LyimoAmounts and remedies
- Prison Sentence: 4
- Time to File Notice and Appeal (days): 30
03
Procedural history
Posture
Misc. Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file notice of intention to appeal out of time
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that failure to lodge the notice of intention to appeal and appeal on time was beyond his control as he received the High Court order on 15 July 2024 while serving a prison sentence.
- Respondent
- The respondent, through Ms. Upendo Lyimo, did not object to the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 R.E 2022
The High Court may, for good cause, admit an appeal notwithstanding that the period of limitation has lapsed.
- 02
Buchumi Oscar vs Republic, Criminal Appeal No. 295 “B” of 2011 (CAT, unreported); William Ndingu @ Ngoso vs Republic, Criminal Application No.3 of 2014 (CAT, unreported); Maneno Muyombe and Another vs Republic, Criminal Appeal No. 435 of 2016
Being in prison and losing control over the appeal process amounts to sufficient cause for delay.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant demonstrated good cause for delay as he was in prison and received the High Court order late, circumstances beyond his control, justifying extension of time.
Court disposition
Application granted
- The applicant is to file a notice of intention to appeal and the appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania within 30 days from the date of this Ruling.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 11 November 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 11 November 2024
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
JUDICIARY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
MBEYA SUB REGISTRY
AT MBEYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 29899 OF 2024 (Originating from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Mbeya Sub -Registry in Criminal Appeal No. 143 of 2023) IBRAHIM MUNDO…………………….………. APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC…………………………………………RESPONDENT
RULING 11 November 2024 & 11 November 2024 SINDA, J.: The applicant has brought this application under section 361 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 R.E 2022 (the CPA). The applicant prays for the following orders: (i) That-this Hon. Court may be pleased to grant the applicant extension of time to file notice of intention to appeal out out of time. (ii) That-any other relief as this hon. Court may deem fit to grant. 1 The chamber application is dully supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant. The applicant has alleged to have been convicted for offence of stealing contrary to section 258 (1) and 265 of the Penal Code Cap 16 R.E 2002 (the Penal Code) and sentenced to serve four years in prison. At the hearing, the applicant appeared in person and unrepresented. The respondent was represented by Ms. Upendo Lyimo, learned State Attorney. The applicant briefly prayed the court to adopt his reasons set forth in his affidavit. Ms. Lyimo did not object the application. Having considered submissions of both parties and examined the grounds stated in the applicant’s affidavit, the question is whether there is any justification for this court to exercise its discretion under section 361 (2) of the CPA. The said provision states that: “The High Court may, for good cause, admit an appeal notwithstanding that the period of limitation prescribed in this section has
lapsed” From the record it is clear that failure to lodge the notice of intention to appeal and appeal on time was beyond the control of the applicant. The applicant received the High Court order on 15 July 2024. Thus, the failure to lodge the notice of intention to appeal and appeal on time. 2 That being the case and considering that the applicant is currently serving time in prison, he has no control over his affairs. It has been decided in the number of cases that being in prison, the applicant loses control of the appeal process thus amounting to sufficient cause for the delay. See: Buchumi Oscar vs Republic, Criminal Appeal No. 295 “B” of 2011 (CAT, unreported) William Ndingu @ Ngoso vs Republic, Criminal Application No.3 of 2014 (CAT, unreported) and Maneno Muyombe and Another vs Republic, Criminal Appeal No. 435 of 2016. As a result, I find applicant advanced the good cause for delay. I grant the application. The applicant is to file a notice of intention to appeal and the appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania within 30 days from the date of this Ruling. DATED at MBEYA on this 11 day of November 2024. A. A. SINDA
JUDGE 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.