ibrahim rajab vs lucas obonyo mwande 2020 tzhc 4175 11 december 2020

ibrahim rajab vs lucas obonyo mwande 2020 tzhc 4175 11 december 2020

There is a point of law meriting scrutiny by the Court of Appeal as to whether an appellate court can entertain an issue of time bar not raised or argued in the trial court or first appellate court.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
ibrahim rajab vs lucas obonyo mwande 2020 tzhc 4175 11 december 2020
Parties
Applicant: Ibrahim Rajab; Respondent: Lucas Obonyo Mwande
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 December 2020
Procedural Posture
PC Miscellaneous Application / Application for Certification of Point of Law to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application partly granted
Legal Topics
Certification of Point of Law, Appellate Jurisdiction, Extension of Time, Limitation Period
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Contract Law Certification of Point of Law Appellate Jurisdiction Extension of Time Limitation Period

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibrahim Rajab

Applicant

Lucas Obonyo Mwande

Respondent

Procedural Posture

PC Miscellaneous Application / Application for Certification of Point of Law to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether an appellate court can entertain an issue of time bar not raised or argued in the trial court or first appellate court
  2. 2 Whether illegality on a point of law is sufficient ground for extension of time to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

There is a point of law meriting scrutiny by the Court of Appeal as to whether an appellate court can entertain an issue of time bar not raised or argued in the trial court or first appellate court.

Court Disposition

Application partly granted

Orders

  • Certification granted on the point whether an appellate court can entertain an issue of time bar not raised or argued in the trial court or first appellate court.
  • Certification refused on the second point regarding illegality as a ground for extension of time.