iddy salum fredy vs republic 2023 tzca 245 12 may 2023

Applicant demonstrated good cause for delay as he was diligent in submitting his application to the Prison Authority within time, and delay was caused by the Prison Authority. Applicant also showed intended grounds for review are recognized under Rule 66(1).

Source-derived case information.

Citation: iddy salum fredy vs republic 2023 tzca 245 12 may 2023
Parties: Applicant: Iddy Salum @ Fredy; Respondent: The Republic
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 12 May 2023
Procedural Posture: Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Review of Appellate Decision, Prisoner Procedural Rights
Source Language: english

Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Appellate Decision Prisoner Procedural Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Iddy Salum @ Fredy

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review

Legal Issues

1 Whether good cause exists for extension of time to apply for review
2 Whether intended grounds for review comply with Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Applicant to lodge intended application for review within sixty (60) days from date of delivery of ruling

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.