Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

ilindilo kachache the administrator of estates of the late kachache ilindilo vs seza dongea another 2024 tzhc 394 22 february 2024

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application for leave to appeal is overtaken by events due to the amendment of section 5 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, which removed the requirement for leave; procedural amendments apply retrospectively.

Court disposition

application withdrawn

Orders

  • application marked withdrawn
  • no order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Ilindilo Kachache (The administrator of estates of the late Kachache)

Applicant Counsel: Neema Charles

Seza Dongea

1st Respondent

Mboje Masangu

2nd Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Application / Withdrawal of Application for Leave to Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether leave is required to appeal to the Court of Appeal after the amendment of section 5 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the High Court judgment, but withdrew the application after legal amendments removed the requirement for leave.
Respondent
No substantive argument recorded; application withdrawn.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) Vs. Jackson Sifael Mtares (Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2018) [2018] TZCA 393

    Procedural amendments to law are retrospective unless stated otherwise.

  2. 02

    Legal Sector Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 of 2023

    Leave to appeal is no longer required for appeals from High Court decisions after the amendment of section 5 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application for leave to appeal is overtaken by events due to the amendment of section 5 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, which removed the requirement for leave; procedural amendments apply retrospectively.

Court disposition

application withdrawn

  • application marked withdrawn
  • no order as to costs

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 22 February 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 22 February 2024

ilindilo kachache the administrator of estates of the late kachache ilindilo vs seza dongea another 2024 tzhc 394 22 february 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

SUMBAWANGA DISTRICT REGISTRY

AT SUMBAWANGA MISC. LAND APPLICATION NO. 26374 OF 2023 (Arising from Land Appeal No. 19 of 2022, at the High Court of Tanzania at Sumbawanga, and Original Land Application No. 12 of 2022 at the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Rukwa at Sumbawanga) ILINDILO KACHACHE (The administrator of estates of the late KACHACHE u indti rn—------------------------- ----- -- appi icant

VERSUS SEZA DONGEA ......... ........................... 1st RESPONDENT MBOJE MASANGU............. ........................... 2nd RESPONDENT 22/02/2024 & 22/02/2024

RULING MWENEMPAZI, J. In this application the applicants felt aggrieved by the judgement of the High Court (Hon. Mruma, 1) delivered on the 2th November, 2023. Hence, they filed this applicant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal, The application is made under section 5(1) (c) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1979 [Cap 141 R.E 2019] Rule 46(1) and Rule 45(a) of Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 of recent, a law has been enacted, legal sector law (miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 of 2023 which came into effect on 1st December, i 2023. Section 10 of the said Act, amends section 5 of the Appellate jurisdiction Act, [Cap 141 R.E 2023], repeals section 5(1) by deleting it and substituting for it the following: - "(1) in civil proceedings except where any other written law provides otherwise, an appeal shall He to the court of appeal against every order or decree, including an ex- parte or pretuminary decree made by the High Court, in the exercise of its original, appellate or revisiona! jurisdiction" The chases featured in the quoted provision of law, have done away with the requirement of leave for one to appeal to the court of appeal against any decision of the high court, regardless of whether the impugned decision is an order, decree, and ex parte decree or a preliminary decree when exercising its original, appellate or revisiona! jurisdiction. In other

words obtaining leave has ceased to be a requirement for one to appeal to the court of appeal effectively from 1st December, 2023. Since the changes have a bearing on procedure law, the applicability of changes has a retrospective effect as well. In case of Director of Public 2 Prosecution (DPP) Vs. Jackson Sifael Mtares (Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2018) [2018] TZCA 393 (7 September 2018) it was held that: - "Procedural amendments to a law, in absence of anything contrary, are retrospective in the sense that they apply to all actions after the date they came into force even though the actions may have began earlier or the claim on which the action may be based occurred on the an terior da te ". Based on the position Neema Charles, Advocate for the applicant has applied to withdraw the application. Under the circumstances, this application is overtaken by events and it was proper for the counsel for the applicants to apply to withdraw the same. For that matter the application is marked withdrawn. No order is issued as to costs. It is ordered accordingly. Dated and delivered this 22nd February, 2024. T.M. MWENEMPAZI

JUDGE 3 Ruling delivered this 22nd February, 2024 in the presence of Ms. Neema Charles, Advocate for the applicant and the 1st Respondent in person. T.M. MWENEMPAZI

JUDGE 22/02/2024 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) Vs. Jackson Sifael Mtares (Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2018) [2018] TZCA 393

Case cited

Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap 141 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Legal Sector Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 of 2023

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.