20120223 TZHC Dar es Salaam1
The 1st and 7th accused were found guilty of carrying out fishing activity in the Tanzanian EEZ without a valid licence and for causing pollution by disposing fish waste into the sea. The evidence, both direct and circumstantial, established that the ship was engaged in fishing in the EEZ, lacked a valid licence, and failed to retain fish waste for port disposal. The 9th, 33rd, and 34th accused were acquitted as there was no evidence of their responsibility or involvement in the offences.
- Citation
- 20120223 TZHC Dar es Salaam1
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; 1st Accused (captain): Hsu Chin Tai; Agent of Ship (represented by Individual): Sunflower Trading Company (SUNSA) / 7th accused; Co Accused (petty Businessman): 9th accused; Engineer (crew): 33rd accused; Engineer (crew): 34th accused
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Session Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- 1st and 7th accused convicted on 1st count (illegal fishing); 1st accused convicted on 2nd count (pollution); 9th, 33rd, and 34th accused acquitted on all counts; 7th and 9th accused acquitted on alternative count (accessory after the fact).
- Legal Topics
- Illegal Fishing, Marine Pollution, Exclusive Economic Zone (eez), Forfeiture of Property, Criminal Liability of Ship Agents and Crew
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Hsu Chin Tai
1st Accused (captain)
Sunflower Trading Company (SUNSA) / 7th accused
Agent of Ship (represented by Individual)
9th accused
Co Accused (petty Businessman)
33rd accused
Engineer (crew)
34th accused
Engineer (crew)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Session Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused carried out fishing activity in the Tanzanian EEZ without a valid licence
- 2 Whether the accused caused pollution and degradation of the marine environment by disposing fish waste and oil into the sea
- 3 Whether the 7th and 9th accused were accessories after the fact
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st and 7th accused were found guilty of carrying out fishing activity in the Tanzanian EEZ without a valid licence and for causing pollution by disposing fish waste into the sea. The evidence, both direct and circumstantial, established that the ship was engaged in fishing in the EEZ, lacked a valid licence, and failed to retain fish waste for port disposal. The 9th, 33rd, and 34th accused were acquitted as there was no evidence of their responsibility or involvement in the offences.
Court Disposition
1st and 7th accused convicted on 1st count (illegal fishing); 1st accused convicted on 2nd count (pollution); 9th, 33rd, and 34th accused acquitted on all counts; 7th and 9th accused acquitted on alternative count (accessory after the fact).
Orders
- 1st and 7th accused to pay a fine of Tshs. 1,000,000,000 or serve 20 years' imprisonment (1st count)
- 1st accused to pay a fine of Tshs. 20,000,000,000 or serve 10 years' imprisonment (2nd count); sentences to run concurrently
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment