20151204 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The strike was unlawful as it was a dispute of right, not interest, justifying substantive termination. However, the employer failed to provide sufficient proof that employees were properly notified and afforded the right to be heard before termination, rendering the process procedurally unfair. Relief was limited...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 20151204 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant: Institute of Social Work; Respondents: Elia Kasalile and 20 others
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision (consolidated) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Partly allowed for employer; employees' revision dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Strike Law, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness, Employment Disputes
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Institute of Social Work
Applicant
Elia Kasalile and 20 others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision (consolidated) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the employees was substantively and procedurally fair
- 2 Whether the strike was lawful under Tanzanian labour law
- 3 Whether all employees were properly before the CMA
Ratio Decidendi
The strike was unlawful as it was a dispute of right, not interest, justifying substantive termination. However, the employer failed to provide sufficient proof that employees were properly notified and afforded the right to be heard before termination, rendering the process procedurally unfair. Relief was limited to four months' salary for each employee due to procedural unfairness.
Court Disposition
Partly allowed for employer; employees' revision dismissed.
Orders
- CMA award of twelve months' salary set aside; four months' salary awarded to each employee for procedural unfairness.
- Severance pay set aside as there was valid reason for termination (misconduct).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment