gaming management t ltd vs gaming board of t another 2005 tzhccomd 41 19 october 2005

gaming management t ltd vs gaming board of t another 2005 tzhccomd 41 19 october 2005

The intervention application was struck out due to procedural defects and because the pending decision on stay and arbitration would render intervention inappropriate; Selcom may file a fresh application if affected by subsequent orders.

Citation
gaming management t ltd vs gaming board of t another 2005 tzhccomd 41 19 october 2005
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Gaming Management (T) Ltd; Defendant/applicant: Gaming Board of Tanzania; Applicant/intervenor: Selcom Tanzania Ltd
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Intervention Application
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Intervention, Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gaming Management (T) Ltd

Plaintiff/respondent

Gaming Board of Tanzania

Defendant/applicant

Selcom Tanzania Ltd

Applicant/intervenor

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Intervention Application

  1. 1 Whether Selcom Tanzania Ltd should be permitted to intervene and be enjoined in the proceedings
  2. 2 Whether pending matters should be stayed pending determination of the intervention application

Ratio Decidendi

The intervention application was struck out due to procedural defects and because the pending decision on stay and arbitration would render intervention inappropriate; Selcom may file a fresh application if affected by subsequent orders.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • Selcom Tanzania Ltd's application to intervene is struck out.
  • No order as to costs for the Selcom application.