tanzania milling company limited vs kwanza tours travels limited and 2 others 2012 tzhclandd 25 1 june 2012

tanzania milling company limited vs kwanza tours travels limited and 2 others 2012 tzhclandd 25 1 june 2012

There is no sufficient reason to allow the intervener to join at this stage as the review proceedings have already commenced and a ruling has been delivered; intervention may be sought after the review is determined.

Citation
tanzania milling company limited vs kwanza tours travels limited and 2 others 2012 tzhclandd 25 1 june 2012
Parties
Applicant/intervener: Tanzania Milling Company Limited; 1st Respondent: Kwanza Tours & Travels Limited; 2nd Respondent: Attorney General; 2nd Respondent: Registrar of Titles
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Cause / Ruling on Application to Intervene and Stay Review Proceedings
Outcome
Application for intervention and stay dismissed
Legal Topics
Intervention in Proceedings, Stay of Proceedings, Review of Court Orders
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Intervention in Proceedings Stay of Proceedings Review of Court Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tanzania Milling Company Limited

Applicant/intervener

Kwanza Tours & Travels Limited

1st Respondent

Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Registrar of Titles

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Cause / Ruling on Application to Intervene and Stay Review Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the intervener can be allowed to intervene and stay review proceedings at this stage
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its inherent powers to allow intervention

Ratio Decidendi

There is no sufficient reason to allow the intervener to join at this stage as the review proceedings have already commenced and a ruling has been delivered; intervention may be sought after the review is determined.

Court Disposition

Application for intervention and stay dismissed

Orders

  • Review proceedings to be heard and determined first
  • Intervener may apply to be joined after decision on review if desired