20180508 TZHC Dodoma
- Citation
- 20180508 TZHC Dodoma
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 8 May 2018
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 8 May 2018
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant's delay was reasonable due to age and illness, and there were legal errors on the face of the ward tribunal proceedings, including lack of legal status to sue and misjoinder of parties, warranting quashing of the decision and nullification of the proceedings.
Court disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Application for extension of time is allowed
- Execution order dated 17/10/2016 is set aside
- Decision and proceedings of the ward tribunal are quashed and nullified
- Parties and all necessary parties are at liberty to file a fresh suit before any competent tribunal
- No order as to costs
02
Material facts
Parties
Ismail Semwali
Applicant Counsel: Ms. Eunice DionisJaneth Sadala
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Government Fee Paid by Respondent: TZS 20,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal
- 02
Whether the ward tribunal proceedings were legally sound
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant argued he failed to file appeal in time due to old age (80 years) and frequent illness; counsel submitted intended appeal has overwhelming chances to succeed.
- Respondent
- Respondent argued applicant did not advance good reasons for failure to file appeal in time.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
General principles of civil procedure
Extension of time may be granted where sufficient cause is shown and delay is reasonable.
- 02
General principles of locus standi
A party must have legal status to sue before a tribunal.
- 03
General principles of civil procedure
Misjoinder of parties can vitiate proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant's delay was reasonable due to age and illness, and there were legal errors on the face of the ward tribunal proceedings, including lack of legal status to sue and misjoinder of parties, warranting quashing of the decision and nullification of the proceedings.
Obiter and limits
- The intended appeal had overwhelming chances to succeed.
- Some portions of land claimed by the respondent are in possession of other people, not the applicant.
Court disposition
Application allowed
- Application for extension of time is allowed
- Execution order dated 17/10/2016 is set aside
- Decision and proceedings of the ward tribunal are quashed and nullified
- Parties and all necessary parties are at liberty to file a fresh suit before any competent tribunal
- No order as to costs
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 8 May 2018
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 8 May 2018
IN THE DISTRICT LAND AND HOUSING TRIBUNAL
FOR DODOMA . AT DODOMA MISC APPLICATION NO 247 OF 2017 ISMAIL SEMWALI.... 'l.••~·-·······•• ■-••·············""""·APPLICANT
VERSUS JANETH SADALA .................................:. ... RESPONDENT t,· -•~.- RULING 'ilt:;: ,.,,.;· .. The applicant here Ismail Semwali is asking for extension of time for filling an appeal against the decision of the ward tribunal of Nghong'onha in the Land Case. No. 41 of 2016. dated 8th June 2016. The .application is - supportE;d by - the·· affidavit sworn .by Ismail _semwali. The . applicant advanced one main reason for him to fail to file an appeal within time. That he is very old of 80 years. And he offenly falls sick for the same reason of age complexicity. His counsel submitted that the intended appeal has merits and the appi'icant has an overwhelming chances to succeed. The counsel for the respondent however submitted that the applicant have not advanced good reasons for his failure to file the appeal in time. I have gone through the submission by both applicant and respondent. I have..also gone through the ward tribunal original proceeding and the following is true. That the applicant and respondent both testified before the ward tribunal. Ind~ed the ward tribunal proceeding, reveals that the applicant is old. And that .. there are some legal errors on face of the ward _tribunal_ proceedings ' . to warrant the intended appeal to have overwhelming chances to succeed. 1 And that the delay by the applicant was reasonable. Under the same reasoning I order the
following. (1) Application is allowed (2) ' The exec~tion order da_~ed 17/10/2016 is set aside (3) , And for the parties not to waste tirne and costs I · proceed to quash the decision ,of the ward tribunal. And nullify the whole 1 . proceeding ofthe ward tribunal. The reason is that the respondent _k ;1(' • filed the case before the ward tribunal without first obtaining legal , status to sue. The appli~qnt here had nothing in possession of . whatever claimed by-_ the respondent. But again .,there was a --- --- - --- ----- -- -- -~-misjoinder_ Qf parties as some portions of land claimed by the , respondent is~in-p-ossession_ofofner people--and--not-t:Me-applicant_.}~ __ __ . here. (4) Parties. and all necessary parties are at libert to file a fresh suit · before-any competent tribunal: _ _ _ _( ~}_ ...~o~:0.r.qer as to the costs it4D r7 U/,;;>~j~;:~~ - - - - - - -. - - .> ~ l(-·: :: ,, <::\ Sdg. H.E. Mw1hava . . Jt: .. ;:i - ~'• '(~( ,t;~j} . ·_;'1:_;_i_} Chairman }~;.·· •!· -:Tribuna . . J .1/,ttjl1, - Ri'.flffu~iijjffj}ed/on this 8th day of May, 2018 in presence o,f both parties and Ms. Eunice Dionis Advocate for the Applicant. Sdg. R.S.S.~ Mandari Chairman 8/5/2018. 2 :-- Government electronic payment gateway Page 1 of2 I Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlements Development Exchequer Receipt Stakabadhi ya Malipo ya Serikali Receipt No : 99002462472 Received from : JANETH SADALA Amount : 20,000.00 TZS Amount in Words : Twenty Thousand Tanzanian Shilling Only In respect of : 140368 - Miscellaneous Receipts -Bill Reference : PETITION. OEAPPEAL IO HIGH
COURT Payment Control Number : 991170926270 Payment Date : 2018-06-04 Issued by :·scHOLASTICA KABUTA NYENDO Date Issued Signature Government Payment Gateway© 2017 All Rights Reserved (GePG) https://www.gepg.go.tz/payments/2690749/successful 26/06/2018
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.