Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

20180508 TZHC Dodoma

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant's delay was reasonable due to age and illness, and there were legal errors on the face of the ward tribunal proceedings, including lack of legal status to sue and misjoinder of parties, warranting quashing of the decision and nullification of the proceedings.

Court disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is allowed
  • Execution order dated 17/10/2016 is set aside
  • Decision and proceedings of the ward tribunal are quashed and nullified
  • Parties and all necessary parties are at liberty to file a fresh suit before any competent tribunal
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Ismail Semwali

Applicant Counsel: Ms. Eunice Dionis

Janeth Sadala

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Government Fee Paid by Respondent: TZS 20,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant argued he failed to file appeal in time due to old age (80 years) and frequent illness; counsel submitted intended appeal has overwhelming chances to succeed.
Respondent
Respondent argued applicant did not advance good reasons for failure to file appeal in time.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General principles of civil procedure

    Extension of time may be granted where sufficient cause is shown and delay is reasonable.

  2. 02

    General principles of locus standi

    A party must have legal status to sue before a tribunal.

  3. 03

    General principles of civil procedure

    Misjoinder of parties can vitiate proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant's delay was reasonable due to age and illness, and there were legal errors on the face of the ward tribunal proceedings, including lack of legal status to sue and misjoinder of parties, warranting quashing of the decision and nullification of the proceedings.

Obiter and limits

  • The intended appeal had overwhelming chances to succeed.
  • Some portions of land claimed by the respondent are in possession of other people, not the applicant.

Court disposition

Application allowed

  • Application for extension of time is allowed
  • Execution order dated 17/10/2016 is set aside
  • Decision and proceedings of the ward tribunal are quashed and nullified
  • Parties and all necessary parties are at liberty to file a fresh suit before any competent tribunal
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 8 May 2018

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 8 May 2018

20180508 TZHC Dodoma

IN THE DISTRICT LAND AND HOUSING TRIBUNAL

FOR DODOMA . AT DODOMA MISC APPLICATION NO 247 OF 2017 ISMAIL SEMWALI.... 'l.••~·-·······•• ■-••·············""""·APPLICANT

VERSUS JANETH SADALA .................................:. ... RESPONDENT t,· -•~.- RULING 'ilt:;: ,.,,.;· .. The applicant here Ismail Semwali is asking for extension of time for filling an appeal against the decision of the ward tribunal of Nghong'onha in the Land Case. No. 41 of 2016. dated 8th June 2016. The .application is - supportE;d by - the·· affidavit sworn .by Ismail _semwali. The . applicant advanced one main reason for him to fail to file an appeal within time. That he is very old of 80 years. And he offenly falls sick for the same reason of age complexicity. His counsel submitted that the intended appeal has merits and the appi'icant has an overwhelming chances to succeed. The counsel for the respondent however submitted that the applicant have not advanced good reasons for his failure to file the appeal in time. I have gone through the submission by both applicant and respondent. I have..also gone through the ward tribunal original proceeding and the following is true. That the applicant and respondent both testified before the ward tribunal. Ind~ed the ward tribunal proceeding, reveals that the applicant is old. And that .. there are some legal errors on face of the ward _tribunal_ proceedings ' . to warrant the intended appeal to have overwhelming chances to succeed. 1 And that the delay by the applicant was reasonable. Under the same reasoning I order the

following. (1) Application is allowed (2) ' The exec~tion order da_~ed 17/10/2016 is set aside (3) , And for the parties not to waste tirne and costs I · proceed to quash the decision ,of the ward tribunal. And nullify the whole 1 . proceeding ofthe ward tribunal. The reason is that the respondent _k ;1(' • filed the case before the ward tribunal without first obtaining legal , status to sue. The appli~qnt here had nothing in possession of . whatever claimed by-_ the respondent. But again .,there was a --- --- - --- ----- -- -- -~-misjoinder_ Qf parties as some portions of land claimed by the , respondent is~in-p-ossession_ofofner people--and--not-t:Me-applicant_.}~ __ __ . here. (4) Parties. and all necessary parties are at libert to file a fresh suit · before-any competent tribunal: _ _ _ _( ~}_ ...~o~:0.r.qer as to the costs it4D r7 U/,;;>~j~;:~~ - - - - - - -. - - .> ~ l(-·: :: ,, <::\ Sdg. H.E. Mw1hava . . Jt: .. ;:i - ~'• '(~( ,t;~j} . ·_;'1:_;_i_} Chairman }~;.·· •!· -:Tribuna . . J .1/,ttjl1, - Ri'.flffu~iijjffj}ed/on this 8th day of May, 2018 in presence o,f both parties and Ms. Eunice Dionis Advocate for the Applicant. Sdg. R.S.S.~ Mandari Chairman 8/5/2018. 2 :-- Government electronic payment gateway Page 1 of2 I Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlements Development Exchequer Receipt Stakabadhi ya Malipo ya Serikali Receipt No : 99002462472 Received from : JANETH SADALA Amount : 20,000.00 TZS Amount in Words : Twenty Thousand Tanzanian Shilling Only In respect of : 140368 - Miscellaneous Receipts -Bill Reference : PETITION. OEAPPEAL IO HIGH

COURT Payment Control Number : 991170926270 Payment Date : 2018-06-04 Issued by :·scHOLASTICA KABUTA NYENDO Date Issued Signature Government Payment Gateway© 2017 All Rights Reserved (GePG) https://www.gepg.go.tz/payments/2690749/successful 26/06/2018

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.