19890224 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
Stay of execution granted pending determination of intended application for extension of time, conditional upon furnishing security of Tshs. 500,000 by applicant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19890224 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
- Parties
- Plaintiff: J. Qo. Chilcimu; Defendant: Tutzijua Cotton Marketing Board
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- stay of execution granted conditionally
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J. Qo. Chilcimu
Plaintiff
Tutzijua Cotton Marketing Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether stay of execution should be granted pending intended application for extension of time to lodge notice of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Stay of execution granted pending determination of intended application for extension of time, conditional upon furnishing security of Tshs. 500,000 by applicant.
Court Disposition
stay of execution granted conditionally
Orders
- Applicant to furnish security of Tshs. 500,000; amount to be deposited as ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN TIIB IIIGII. cotf..T OF Tl,HZ.".Nif.. f,.T D!ill ES Sli.LLli.M CIVIL Ci.SE NO~ 22 OF 1908 1 J .,Qo· Cllil.CIU~ o • • o o o o • o • o o • • o • • • o • • o • • • "• •.," • ,. .. • • • • • • • • • .,PLAINTIFF vorBus • • TlJTZl'JUA COTTON Ni'.JLTOOING BOl.RD • • • .,. • •• • ,• •. • •• • ••••••• DEfflIDIJ:JT 1 " M!i.PIG!'Jrn, J., RULING The clefondwt/judgment-debtor has n,ppliod for stci;y of execution of the decree ponding tho heoring of a.11 nppoal which it intoncls to lodgo with the Court of Appoc1l. Judgoent was lX',sscd c:i.gainst it 011 ~pteL1ber 6, 198~•, .... It was o.n ex-po.rte judgment., • ~ • It is cannon ground that no notice of appeal ha.con lodgod with tho Registrar of tho High Court to-dn.te. Rulo 76 (2) of tho Tanzania Court of· Appeal Rules, 1979, provides that a notice of appeal should bo lodged within fourteen clcys of tl:.o dato of the decision o,.gcinst whic:::. it is desired to appon So on tJ:o £'2.00 of it tine within w::ich to loclgo tho notice J.1c1,s 'oxpirod. I 2.f:,T with t!1e construction put to 0.39 r,5(2) c.P.c. by 1-'.Ir·• 1fairc1, counsel for t!10 rospondont/ clecroo-hold0r, th[-\,t it is essential for tho applicc1,bili ty ~f d.39 r.5, under 1;r!:ich t~1is applico.tion is m,7,do, tl1at tho np1)1ic[.',ticn for stcy l)o made beforo tho expiry of tho proscribocl period of linit"'tion for tho appoo.1, Miss. Mj2,siri, counsel for t~rn 1:()plicant, hc1s clrnwn my attention to tho fact that tho appli.t was absont w:1011 t!.10 o:i~-parte judgment w0,s pronounc.ecl. According to l10r, tho 2,pplicont bocar.10 r.wc;ro of tho oxistonco of tho juclgoont fron oid~NovoLJbor 9 1988, clJld tho..t it intends to apply to the Court of Appeal for extension of timo for lodgine: a notice of 2,ppeal, unclor rule 8 of tJ::.o Cour of Appeal Rules, I h0,vo no reason to doubt tho word of Miss. Mjasiri, but I think tto npplico.nt will possibly hc:,vo sor.10 difficulty to o:;;;pl0,in wby no sulf1 application Lc1s not cone forth since nid-Novonbor 9 1988. I have cc.1,I'ofully w0ighed tho [l,l'gunonts for and ngainst a grant of ~·~;zy- in this matter,. I hnve cone to tho conclusion that a stcy s)Muld bo grq.nto~ pendinc; tl:o clGton.1ination of tho intonclocl n,pplication for extension of t:Loo,: • Tho stoy will b0 condi tiona3. t~ tho furnishing of :ocuri ty in Ctloiuro ts~ ;Io.tf'◄ .,i' t shs.500, 000/= by tho applicant ~:1icl: amount is to cleposi tocl ~1 v . r, so ordered, Delivorocl to tho ad.voca,tos. ~ ... ..# D.P. ~~zr-9a_;_~ O JUDGE