CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO

The applicant failed to account for the entire period of delay and did not provide sufficient cause as required by law. The absence of supporting affidavits from prison officers and failure to explain the delay after receiving the judgment copy were fatal to the application. The grounds for review were either misplaced or not properly substantiated.

Citation
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO
Parties
Applicant: Jackson Godwin; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Good Cause for Delay, Procedural Requirements
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Good Cause for Delay Procedural Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Godwin

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for delay in filing the review application
  2. 2 Whether the grounds for review were properly stated and substantiated

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for the entire period of delay and did not provide sufficient cause as required by law. The absence of supporting affidavits from prison officers and failure to explain the delay after receiving the judgment copy were fatal to the application. The grounds for review were either misplaced or not properly substantiated.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed