jacob lemanya vs village chairman hombolo makulu village another 2016 tzhc 2058 6 december 2016
The Tribunal's failure to invite parties to address issues of time limitation and locus standi constituted a denial of the right to be heard, vitiating the ruling and order.
- Citation
- jacob lemanya vs village chairman hombolo makulu village another 2016 tzhc 2058 6 december 2016
- Parties
- Appellant: Jacob Lemanya; 1st Respondent: Village Chairman Hombolo Makulu Village; 2nd Respondent: Registered Trustees of Catholic Diocese of Dodoma
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Heard, Natural Justice, Locus Standi, Time Limitation, Legal Entity Status
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Jacob Lemanya
Appellant
Village Chairman Hombolo Makulu Village
1st Respondent
Registered Trustees of Catholic Diocese of Dodoma
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Land and Housing Tribunal denied parties the right to be heard on issues of time limitation and locus standi
- 2 Whether the 1st respondent is a legal entity capable of being sued
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's failure to invite parties to address issues of time limitation and locus standi constituted a denial of the right to be heard, vitiating the ruling and order.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Ruling and drawn order of the District Land and Housing Tribunal dated 22nd March 2016 declared null and void
- Ruling and order quashed and set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment