jacquiline donath kweka abrahamson vs exim bank tanzania ltd and others 2020 tzhc 2006 20 february 2020

jacquiline donath kweka abrahamson vs exim bank tanzania ltd and others 2020 tzhc 2006 20 february 2020

The plaintiff's prayer to amend the plaint does not meet the principle that amendments should not substitute the cause of action; therefore, the prayer is not maintainable and the objections are upheld.

Citation
jacquiline donath kweka abrahamson vs exim bank tanzania ltd and others 2020 tzhc 2006 20 february 2020
Parties
Plaintiff: Jacquiline Donath Kweka Abrahamson; 1st Defendant: Exim Bank Tanzania Limited; 2nd Defendant: Johan Harald Christer Abrahamsson; 3rd Defendant: Dascar Limited; 4th Defendant: Mass & Associates Company Ltd & Court Broker; 5th Defendant: Yusuph Shaban Matibwa
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint
Outcome
Suit struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Jurisdiction, Res Subjudice
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jacquiline Donath Kweka Abrahamson

Plaintiff

Exim Bank Tanzania Limited

1st Defendant

Johan Harald Christer Abrahamsson

2nd Defendant

Dascar Limited

3rd Defendant

Mass & Associates Company Ltd & Court Broker

4th Defendant

Yusuph Shaban Matibwa

5th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's prayer to amend the plaint is meritorious
  2. 2 Whether the amendment would substitute the cause of action

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's prayer to amend the plaint does not meet the principle that amendments should not substitute the cause of action; therefore, the prayer is not maintainable and the objections are upheld.

Court Disposition

Suit struck out with costs

Orders

  • Suit struck out
  • Plaintiff to pay costs