19890131 TZHC Tanga
The appellant knowingly acted fraudulently by purporting to sell a house he did not own, supported by fake documents, thus his conviction under section 302 of the Penal Code is upheld.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19890131 TZHC Tanga
- Parties
- Appellant: Jafari Mohamed; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
- Legal Topics
- Obtaining Money by False Pretences, Fraud, Ownership Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jafari Mohamed
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant obtained money by false pretences
- 2 Whether the appellant fraudulently sold property not belonging to him
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant knowingly acted fraudulently by purporting to sell a house he did not own, supported by fake documents, thus his conviction under section 302 of the Penal Code is upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
Orders
- Conviction under section 302 of the Penal Code upheld
- Sentence of three years imprisonment confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN TII:J ITIGII .COURT OF TA1'1-Yu~IA AT TJi.lJGAo lil"PELLATE Jti1IISDICTI011 nm COURT ·cr,.IKINil.1 APPillJ: ro;.:.6(} OF· '1981 ORIGDrJJJ CRD'.II:!J: C.-.'.iS:C l':O. 228 OF 198'5 OF TIE DISTRICT COullT or· TJTGL :DI0TIU:C'l1 AT Ti.NGA :BEF'OP,.J; 1J oJ o }r{Af!iJ',j:JAGi'J:'J.. , ~~SQ.~ SE:NIOR llli3 .MAGISTR:,.TD (JJ1ARI MOE.f'.JvLlfDI · • • ., • • ., • o ., ., • ., o • ~ ••• o • • • ., • • Al'PEI..LA:NT (ORG. ACCUSDD) vers'Ul3 · THE BZ:PUilLIC o • •• • • • ., ., o o • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • RDSPOlT.Dil}lT (ORG. PRos:;curOR) JUDGE NE H ~. '. SISYJ:. Ja-· The appellant nas convicted by the leernec~ /Senior Resid.ent Magistrate, Tango,, of' ·tll_c offence of O'ots.ining money by false J)!'Otencas contrary to section 302 of the Penal Code cmC:. he 1ro,is sentenced. to three years imprismm1011t. Ile is l10W a.ppe,ai.ing. The facts ulrich tho learned. SEinior RcsicLont Jl/lu.&,i.strate found establisLeo. ai:id actec';. Ul)O?'l show th2,t tr..e r,pi::cllc,nt is thG nephew i.;.t• one Mwinchumu Ibr.:hl.m, Pi,·)'I in tho case. Sometime in 1977 th0 said lhdnchumu Ibrahim a. resident of Pc·.ng;:.ni, askod. tho ~1r,:t_.;0lle,n-c to find anc:'.. bGf a hous0 for him horo in Tc,ngaj This was dl'.u:Je and Fi!I entrusted cash, sha .. 30,000/=, to the appe lJ;:mt fm.' tho :-i,,u:r1Jos0 o ::Wentu.2,lly, tl1e house was bought ancl the right of occu:p2.ncy over the plot upon which it stood was c1.uly trc-,nsfG:rcd. to P\Uo The :relevant transfer deed, Dxh.PI, shows th.at the seller of ~he house was one Victor Ramadhani .(Dll oI) o,nd th0 transfer was duly ap:prmred. by the Imld Offioor. PfTI continued to rosido at Pa:ngv.ni. lli.s son, Jumbe Mwinohumu (Pfi5). and sano te1,a,nts lmro, howcvor,, stL,yin,g i11 tho hou.se u.n<:er quorry. Sanctimo in mid 1981 tho appellant sold tho SC.Ille houso to one Halifo. Rn.mud (Pii2) ~d thout tho knowloclgo and/ or conoont of PIU, or bis son, PV5. A tro,nsfor deed (J?5) wo.s cluly o::::ecutod. and. the • pur:portoo. sale wa,s roduood to writing (P4) • t. - 2 - In his d0fence ct tho tri::'J,. the e,ppoll2.nt contonc..ccl trot the . house under quer:ry was lus own and th,.• t ho ~) 01..1.cLt it from one Victor &ma,clb£,ni. (DE .. I). In support of l:,j_EJ ccJJo t~ ..o e,:;,·,:Qolk.nt proclu.oed ' . transfer deeds in :ro::,poct of tb.0 plot on 1:·hich tho hOW:l0 in qu0stion .. now stands fran Victor· B.i.".ri1c(:JJ::1,rtl to bin:sol:f c~nd f1~om himself to the ocinplnina.nt in the oos0 c.ncl scrn0 'receipts' issuocJ. by Victor Re.mc::.dhr.mi (DW 2). ·The appell..,.nt also c..:.llcd. Victor Rc1:1c.t'.J:lo,n:i. (Dl: .2) as a witness ·on his side. Dl:2 testified tho.t ho trcnsferrod ,, <1ll his rights avo._r tho plot in question to the •o tho appollr-nt in 1979• Evidonco wt•..s given by the _'fu,ng.:,, Municipcl .Douncil Lo.l'ld Officer, one Abdi Shemnc1olwn (Pt:3) tba t the only traJ.Sior of tho right of occupanoy over the plot in question which is :refloct0d in tho offioial records wcs tho one from Victor Remadh·:mi to Kdnchumu Toro.him (PU I)~ The pUJ:'l'.)orted transfers from Victor fu..rnadh:.:.ni to tho appollcnt and :fl-an the o.ppGllc.nt to tho oom:plci.m.nt (P5) w0,s not recorded in tho official rccards. Shomndolwa's evidence uc.s not ch,.~ll0%<T0d or i cont:ro.dict0d an tbir.: :point& In his juo. gemont, tho 10a.rn0cl Soro.or nccic'..cnt N.:...gistr2,to 'Was s;:,,tisficd th...,t all tho documents :proclucoc1 by tho t . p:pcllc.nt in support of bis ocse wore fo.k.o a.nd ho d5.n:rogo.rd<?c1. them r..coo:rding;ly. · me, . In n:t'gui:ng out this 0,pp02.l boforo /tho !JJ2,Xr1cd Counsel far :gbo appellant, Mr. kvutc. 1 contended tbL-:,t there is no conolusive · evidenoo to sh_6w th.:.t tho houso in question tolonuO'f! to F:·r, :pm-ticulnrly so wlu:ln tho o.llogoc. sollor, Victor lbmc..clharp., wr..s not cn.llocl as e wi tress on tho Prosooution sido. On this lc.ttcr point all I ron say is that it is. a .mcttc:r on which docmonto...ry ovidonco (PI) na.s produoea., and ·cn.oe a.droi tted it is n point on which tho · relcv::·,nt clocumcnt (PI) speal.B for itself. 'llho learned Counsel for the appollo.nt: crGU0d further tk,t there wo.s no rec.son why tho clocmontm-y ovid.cnco 1'.)roduc0d lJy his oliont was not 2.ccoptec:.. In other words, 2.:rguod Mr o IC2,vu.t2,, th:ls amountod to fciluro to consider tho dofoncc ccsc. ' - 3 -- The loc.rnoct St..'1to J. .ttorney, I(j_ss Cbi11guwilo; did not seolt to su;pport tho cOl'+Viotion. According to b.01~ the matter ·wt.a mo:ro of c 'oivil' nr.tm·o tbc~11 or:iJnin,;1.l boct.t'!EO tbo icsuo o:f 01:nol'Sbip of tho house ht,tl not boon resolved. With the groo.tost rospoct to both loro-nod counsel o.nc!. tho lofl.rnoc1 Stn.to attorney, once tho Prooccution wi tnossos n.ro believed, cu:~ tho loo.med Senior nosillont Mccistr.::,tc did, thon thorc romninn no rQ,.)JTJ for dou:bt th:::. t tho a:ppolL~nt was n.ctinc frt,udulontly. lie wc.s the porson i.-ho wo.c c.slmcl to, encl .infect diet, bey tho house uncler g_tv1--:ry o;:: bob.elf of PWio It is, to my mine., v-ory p0ril10trl:i to note thr~t tW.s i8 not a c2,so of double o.llocc, ti on of plots~ It :i.s '-' er.so of a singlo ind:i:vidw.l .dishonestly t1~yixig to j_)l2-y c 11112,l role• The leo.rnod Somor Rcsido11t rilc·{_;i8txc..to hr,cl tho grout a.c.1:vn.ntn.go o:f so0i11g_. n.nd obso1-vinc the wi tricssos j_n the ·d tnoss box. On my p::.rt,. I cc.nnot sc,y thc..t ho c..,,Jt'!f:JOG... t_ru::.t aclvc.ntc..g,u. Once tho evicl.once of Shomndol1ra. is 2.coc:ptot~ tho11, :i.ndocD.., tho:ro cr,:n 1Jo no doubt th:d t!Js nppell0nts documcnto in relation to tho plot end house in question ro:-o fcl~. That being so (encl. I o.groo 1,i th tho loc.rnocL Senior Rcsid.cnt 1'1.:-.r..,istrr..to thc..t it is) ... then thoro cm1 be no cloul)t tret tho c.ppell.D. nt ;k)lly. wo 11 know tb...1, t tho hOtWo unclcr quarry w2.s B£.l his own c..nd by :purportine to clis:;ioso it off for c, 00Y1..sic"'...orot~.on tho o.ppollrmt c,cted fc.lsoly end. :f':t'a.ti.dulontly. Tho conviction ts Gou:nd in lmr 2.nt tho SDJn0 is heroby uphold. i As rogr,1·ds sontonco, I think tho o..ppc 112. :nt dosorvoc: it• IJ:f.s W'n<', ru.1 net of commis8ion 11ld.ch olor..rly :i..mrolvo{;_ })ron0clitc.tion. Ho oven 'tm:·:r f'urthcr r..nd frntaoC:. fc,lso c"i.octu:1c;nts • r-oc;ul t this .:-,ppc::.l f0:i.lo :·.m: it is . -JJ l 4 • (rrJef.D.·~ JUDG:ill • ocl in open Court c.t - Prcscnta .