james kapyata vs mcc limited 2022 tzhcld 770 14 july 2022

james kapyata vs mcc limited 2022 tzhcld 770 14 july 2022

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application to extend the decree after a notice of appeal has been lodged against the judgment and decree.

Citation
james kapyata vs mcc limited 2022 tzhcld 770 14 july 2022
Parties
Applicant: James Kapyata; Respondent: MCC Limited
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Decree
Outcome
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreement, Golden Handshake Allowance, Jurisdiction After Notice of Appeal
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Kapyata

Applicant

MCC Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Decree

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to extend a decree after a notice of appeal has been filed
  2. 2 Whether the applicant can be covered by the decree in consolidated labour disputes

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application to extend the decree after a notice of appeal has been lodged against the judgment and decree.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Application struck out.