james kapyata vs mcc limited 2022 tzhcld 770 14 july 2022
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application to extend the decree after a notice of appeal has been lodged against the judgment and decree.
- Citation
- james kapyata vs mcc limited 2022 tzhcld 770 14 july 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: James Kapyata; Respondent: MCC Limited
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Decree
- Outcome
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Collective Bargaining Agreement, Golden Handshake Allowance, Jurisdiction After Notice of Appeal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
James Kapyata
Applicant
MCC Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Decree
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to extend a decree after a notice of appeal has been filed
- 2 Whether the applicant can be covered by the decree in consolidated labour disputes
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application to extend the decree after a notice of appeal has been lodged against the judgment and decree.
Court Disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Application struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment