JAMES KHATIBU 222 Edit

JAMES KHATIBU 222 Edit

The appeal was filed out of time and is incompetent; additionally, the appellant's absence justified dismissal for want of prosecution.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
JAMES KHATIBU 222 Edit
Parties
Appellant: James Khatibu; Respondent: Ismail Ramadhani Kilala
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal, Limitation of Time, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Limitation of Time Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Khatibu

Appellant

Ismail Ramadhani Kilala

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was filed out of time and is incompetent; additionally, the appellant's absence justified dismissal for want of prosecution.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed for being time barred and for want of prosecution
  • costs awarded to respondent