Libel vs Elias Ruling fine for tanzlii
The court lacks jurisdiction to grant extension of time after an appeal has been dismissed as time-barred; the proper recourse is appeal or revision, not a fresh application for extension.
- Citation
- Libel vs Elias Ruling fine for tanzlii
- Parties
- Applicant: James Libel Bruno; Respondent: Elias Peter Misalaba
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Limitation of Actions, Appeals, Execution of Decrees
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
James Libel Bruno
Applicant
Elias Peter Misalaba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant can seek extension of time to file an appeal after previous appeal was dismissed as time-barred
Ratio Decidendi
The court lacks jurisdiction to grant extension of time after an appeal has been dismissed as time-barred; the proper recourse is appeal or revision, not a fresh application for extension.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment