james mwangolombe vs hadson mwaitebele 2015 tzhc 2301 8 september 2015

james mwangolombe vs hadson mwaitebele 2015 tzhc 2301 8 september 2015

The appeal is time barred as the respondent had been in possession for over 12 years and the appellant delayed unreasonably. The appellant also lacked locus standi as he was not the administrator of his late father's estate.

Citation
james mwangolombe vs hadson mwaitebele 2015 tzhc 2301 8 september 2015
Parties
Appellant: James Mwangolombe; Respondent: Hadson Mwaitebele
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
8 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Locus Standi, Adverse Possession
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Mwangolombe

Appellant

Hadson Mwaitebele

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is time barred under the Law of Limitation Act
  2. 2 Whether the appellant has locus standi to institute the suit

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is time barred as the respondent had been in possession for over 12 years and the appellant delayed unreasonably. The appellant also lacked locus standi as he was not the administrator of his late father's estate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Right of appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania explained