january makanta vs republic 2013 tzca 203 24 june 2013
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to file a valid notice of appeal in compliance with the mandatory requirements of the Court of Appeal Rules, and thus there was no competent appeal before the court.
- Citation
- january makanta vs republic 2013 tzca 203 24 june 2013
- Parties
- Appellant: January Makanta; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal Before the Court of Appeal After High Court Dismissal
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- Notice of Appeal, Procedural Compliance, Rape
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
January Makanta
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal Before the Court of Appeal After High Court Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is competent in the absence of a valid notice of appeal as required by the Court of Appeal Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to file a valid notice of appeal in compliance with the mandatory requirements of the Court of Appeal Rules, and thus there was no competent appeal before the court.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out
Orders
- Appeal struck out for lack of a valid notice of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment