jara security coltd vs amani hmombo 2021 tzhcld 2022 10 december 2021

jara security coltd vs amani hmombo 2021 tzhcld 2022 10 december 2021

The applicant failed to account for the delay of more than four months after being granted leave to refile the revision, and did not provide evidence of diligence or sufficient cause. The alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record and did not constitute a sufficient ground for extension of time. Therefore, the application for extension of time was dismissed for lack of merit.

Citation
jara security coltd vs amani hmombo 2021 tzhcld 2022 10 december 2021
Parties
Applicant: Jara Security Co. Ltd; Respondent: Amani H. Mombo
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
10 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitral Award, Good Cause for Delay, Technical Delay, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision of Arbitral Award Good Cause for Delay Technical Delay Illegality as Ground for Extension

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jara Security Co. Ltd

Applicant

Amani H. Mombo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good or sufficient cause for extension of time to file a revision against the CMA award
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in the CMA award constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for the delay of more than four months after being granted leave to refile the revision, and did not provide evidence of diligence or sufficient cause. The alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record and did not constitute a sufficient ground for extension of time. Therefore, the application for extension of time was dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Right of appeal to the Court of Appeal explained.