20131126 TZCA Arusha1 1
The application is incompetent for failure to cite the specific rule under which it is brought as required by the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 20131126 TZCA Arusha1 1
- Parties
- Applicant: Jeremiah J. Nkinda; Respondent: Tanzania Breweries Ltd (Successor & Majority Shareholders of TBL Farms Ltd)
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Application for Hearing Before the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Defective Application, Service of Process, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeremiah J. Nkinda
Applicant
Tanzania Breweries Ltd (Successor & Majority Shareholders of TBL Farms Ltd)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Application for Hearing Before the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application is competent for hearing in the absence of proper citation of the enabling provision
- 2 Whether the respondent was properly served
Ratio Decidendi
The application is incompetent for failure to cite the specific rule under which it is brought as required by the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA ATARUSHA (CORAM: KIMARO, J.A., MASSATI, J.A., And MMILLA, J.A.) MSH. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2012 J EREII1IAH J. NKINDA .................. .................... APPLICANT VERSUS TANZANIA BREWERIES LTD SUCCESSOR & MAJORITY SHARE HOLDERS OF TBL FARMS LTD) ..................... RESPONDENT (Application from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Moshi) (Mzuna, J.) dated the 5k" day of October, 2012 in Misc. Civil Application No. 35 of 2010 ORDER OF THE COURT MASSATI. ].A.: When the application was called on for hearing, only the applicant appeared. The respondent did not appear because, although the affidavit of service of the summons on the Chief Executive Director Tanzania Breweries shows that it was received by one N [[MA SAMWEL. There is no official stamp of the respondent (which is a corporate body) nor is the title of the said NEEMA SAMWEL in the respondent company indicated. We were therefore unsure whether the respondent was properly served. We were inclined to adjourn the matter but for the fact that the application itself is fatally defective for failing to cite the specific rule under which it is brought as required by Rule 48 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. The applicant himself has conceded, to this defect. In view of the circumstances, the application is incompetent. We cannot adjourn a nothing. So the application is accordingly struck out. We make no order as to costs. DATED at ARUSHA this 26th day of November, 2013. N.P. KIMARO JUSTICE OF APPEAL AP 4cr S.A. MASSATI JUSTICE OF APPEAL - ..V• B.M. MMILLA JUSTICE OF APPEAL I Certify that this is a true copy of the original. F.J. KABWE DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT OF APPEAL