jidodo jidesheni vs hagaka gembe 1985 tzhc 44 17 september 1985
The presumption of legitimacy was rebutted by clear evidence of Magaka Gembe's impotence and lack of consummation, and the gestation period aligns with Jidondo Jidesheni's marriage to Minza. Unexplained blood group evidence was insufficient to override factual findings.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- jidodo jidesheni vs hagaka gembe 1985 tzhc 44 17 september 1985
- Parties
- Appellant: Jidondo Jidesheni; Respondent: Magaka Gembe
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Paternity, Legitimacy of Child, Presumption of Legitimacy, Medical Evidence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jidondo Jidesheni
Appellant
Magaka Gembe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jidondo Jidesheni or Magaka Gembe is the father of Shagembe Jidondo
- 2 Whether the presumption of legitimacy applies given alleged impotence and timing of birth
Ratio Decidendi
The presumption of legitimacy was rebutted by clear evidence of Magaka Gembe's impotence and lack of consummation, and the gestation period aligns with Jidondo Jidesheni's marriage to Minza. Unexplained blood group evidence was insufficient to override factual findings.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Declaration that Jidondo Jidesheni is the father of Shagembe Jidondo
- Costs awarded to appellant in this court and courts below
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment