joel nathanel nkinga vs bgs tanzania limited another 2022 tzhcld 1170 15 september 2022
The application was dismissed because the supporting affidavit was tainted with untruth, contained extraneous matters, and had a defective verification clause, and the applicant had already been given an opportunity to amend but failed to cure the defects.
- Citation
- joel nathanel nkinga vs bgs tanzania limited another 2022 tzhcld 1170 15 september 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Joel Nathanael Nkinga; 1st Respondent: BG'S Tanzania Limited; 2nd Respondent: Josina Company Limited & Auctioneer
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Land Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Defects, Preliminary Objections, Execution of Judgments, Revision Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joel Nathanael Nkinga
Applicant
BG'S Tanzania Limited
1st Respondent
Josina Company Limited & Auctioneer
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Land Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application is supported by an affidavit tainted with untruth
- 2 Whether the affidavit contains extraneous matters
- 3 Whether the verification clause in the affidavit is defective
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the supporting affidavit was tainted with untruth, contained extraneous matters, and had a defective verification clause, and the applicant had already been given an opportunity to amend but failed to cure the defects.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment