johansen bishota lwekamwa vs tanzania zambia railways authority 2020 tzhclandd 3875 27 november 2020
The appeal was filed more than three years after the judgment without evidence of a timely request for a copy of the judgment or an order extending time; therefore, the appeal is time barred and must be dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- johansen bishota lwekamwa vs tanzania zambia railways authority 2020 tzhclandd 3875 27 november 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Johansen Bishota Lwekamwa; Respondent: Tanzania Zambia Railways Authority
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (time Bar)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as time barred with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Appeals, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johansen Bishota Lwekamwa
Appellant
Tanzania Zambia Railways Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (time Bar)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period
- 2 Whether the appellant justified the delay in filing the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was filed more than three years after the judgment without evidence of a timely request for a copy of the judgment or an order extending time; therefore, the appeal is time barred and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as time barred with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed as time barred.
- Appellant to pay costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION) AT DAR ES SALAAM LAND APPEAL NO. 15 OF 2020 JOHANSEN BISHOTA LWEKAMWA................................................... APPELLANT VERSUS TANZANIA ZAMBIA RAILWAYS AUTHORITY................................ RESPONDENT Date ofJudgment 27/11/2020 Date of the last order28/9/2020 RULING I, MAIGE, J This is an appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Temeke in Land Application No. 24 of 2016 which was delivered on 7th November 2017. This appeal was filed on 27th January 2020. It is more than three years from the date of the judgment. In a statement just immediate after the citation of the registration number of the appeal, it is indicative that though the judgment was delivered on 7th November 2017, it was made available to the appellant for collection on 13th December 2019. The appellant has neither attached nor pleaded a request letter to suggest that he requested for a copy of judgment soon after the delivery of the i judgment or at all. Therefore, on 9th April 2020, this Court ordered the parties to appear on 16th June 2020 and address the Court if the appeal was not time barred. On 16th June, 2020, the appellant was present in person and the respondent was absent. The Court ordered that the preliminary issue and the substance of the appeal be argued by way of written submissions. The appellant filed his written submissions in person whereas advocate Mercy Chimtawi filed the same for and on behalf of the respondent. In their written submissions, I have noted, neither of the parties remarked on the issue of time limitation. I take it that they have abandoned their right to be heard on the legal point raised by the Court on its own motion. I have carefully casted a glance over the memorandum of appeal and its annexures. On the face of it, the appeal appears to be hopelessly time barred. It has been filed after the expiry of more than three years from the date of the judgment without there being an order extending time to appeal. The appellant has attempted to demonstrate in his memorandum of appeal that a copy of judgment was made available to him on 3rd December 2019. In so far as he has not attached in his memorandum of appeal any request 2 letter suggesting that he timely requested for a copy of judgment, the fact that he was supplied with the same on 13th December, 2020 cannot justify the delay. In my opinion therefore, this appeal is hopelessly time barred and it is accordingly dismissed with costs. It is so ordered. I. Maige JUDGE 27/11/2020 3 Date: 27/11/2020 Coram: Hon. S.H. Simfukwe - DR For the Applicant: Present in person For the Respondent: Absent RMA: Bukuku ORDER: Ruling delivered this 27th day of November, 2020. S.H. Simfukwe DEPUTY REGISTRAR 27/11/2020 4