John Claret Mdenye v Uchumi Commercial Bank Ltd and 3 Others
Applicant established sufficient cause for non-appearance due to child's illness, warranting setting aside the dismissal order.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- John Claret Mdenye v Uchumi Commercial Bank Ltd and 3 Others
- Parties
- Applicant: John Claret Mdenye; Respondent: Uchumi Commercial Bank Ltd; Respondent: Regiz Company Ltd; Respondent: Tanfin Consultant (E.A) Limited; Respondent: Peter Malya
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Dismissal Order, Sufficient Cause for Non Appearance, Illness as Ground for Restoration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Claret Mdenye
Applicant
Uchumi Commercial Bank Ltd
Respondent
Regiz Company Ltd
Respondent
Tanfin Consultant (E.A) Limited
Respondent
Peter Malya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown to set aside the dismissal order for want of prosecution
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant established sufficient cause for non-appearance due to child's illness, warranting setting aside the dismissal order.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Dismissal order set aside
- Civil Revision to proceed inter parties on a date to be fixed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IN THE SUB-REGISTRY OF MANYARA AT BABATI MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5431 OF 2024 (C/F Civil Revision No. 2 of2024 High Court of Tanzania, Manyara Sub Registry and Civil Case No. 01 of 2023 of the Resident Magistrate Court of Babati) JOHN CLARET MDENYE.................................................................................... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. UCHUMI COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.................................. 2. REGIZ COMPANY LTD......................................................... RESPONDENTS 3. TANFIN CONSULTANT (E.A) LIMITED................................ 4. PETER MALYA.................................................................. RULING 2d and 3Cfh May 2024 MIRINDO, J.: This is an application to set aside the dismissal order that saw Civil Revision No 83 of 2024 dismissed for want of prosecution on 12 March 2024. On that date I dismissed the Civil Revision for non-appearance of the applicant. His main ground for seeking to set aside the dismissal order is that on that date the 1 applicant's counsel, Mr Richard Evance Manyota, had a sick child whom he took for medical checkup at Kaloleni Health Center in Arusha. At the hearing of the application, Mr Manyota, learned counsel appeared for the Applicant and the respondent was represented by Mr Advocate Ibrahim Komu, learned counsel. At the hearing, Mr Manyota, learned counsel, sought leave to adopt his supporting affidavit as part of his submission. He asked the Court to set aside the dismissal order and allow the Civil Revision to be heard inter parties. He referred this Court to the Court of Appeal's decision in Loshilu Karaine and Others v Abraham Melkizedeck Kaaya (Civil Appeal no. 534 of 2020) [2024] TZCA 93 where it was held that illness is a sufficient reason to set aside the dismissal order. In opposition, Mr Komu, learned counsel argued that the medical report was undetailed on material particulars. The affidavit did not explain how his child was ill and how that illness necessitated counsel to take the child to the hospital and for that reason he failed to appear before the Court. The medical report does not indicate who treated the child. It is in form of a letter of the clinic he attended. It only contains a rubber stamp. Anyone can stamp a document. After examining the applicant's affidavit and the medical report, I am satisfied that the applicant has established sufficient cause of illness of the child 2 that he took for medical treatment on the fixed for hearing of Civil Revision No 83 of 2024. The application is granted and hearing inter parties to proceed as on the date to be fixed from the date of this ruling. Costs in the cause. DATED at BABATI this 29th day of May, 2024 Court: Ruling delivered this 30th day of May, 2024 in the presence of the applicant's counsel, Richard Manyota also holding brief for the respondents' counsel, Advocate Ibrahim Komu. B/C: William Makori (RMA) present. Right of appeal explained. F.M. IRINDO JUDGE 30/5/2024 3