19890612 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The suit must be transferred to the District Court as the subject matter falls within its jurisdiction, and section 13 C.P.C. is mandatory.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19890612 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Cleoant; Defendant: Ubungo Farm Implements Ltd
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Objection Ruling
- Outcome
- Suit transferred to Kisuru District Court for trial by a competent magistrate. Plaintiff to bear costs.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Transfer of Suit, Court Hierarchy
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Cleoant
Plaintiff
Ubungo Farm Implements Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be instituted in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction given the value of the subject matter
Ratio Decidendi
The suit must be transferred to the District Court as the subject matter falls within its jurisdiction, and section 13 C.P.C. is mandatory.
Court Disposition
Suit transferred to Kisuru District Court for trial by a competent magistrate. Plaintiff to bear costs.
Orders
- Suit transferred to Kisuru District Court
- Plaintiff to bear costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
i, •• • '·;of •.i.n!!i· :JJ:J:1:n.t 1.HJ,.._ __ ,._ . ':'; •-= ~ TIJI.ti. . ll.T DhR ~ SWi.iu-1 ·. CIVIL Cf.SE NO. 229 OF 1987 versus tIDUlfGO Fll.BN. - ~ LTD ........- ... 4 ..................... • • • .DEFENnt.N1!. RU· LIU G MTEN'G!.i.., -T~ In this suit, the plaintiff' Mr• J obn Cleo.ant a. soO'Ul.1i V guard with ''bungo Farm IDplitlents Ltd.tt is suing his employer "Ubungo Fnrn Iopl;i.ments Ltd" ola.Sn.i:ng for n. total sum of shs.2009()00/--:- i.e• aha. ~ooo./- as dame.gas for dof'az:iation and ahs.100,000/"'."' as oompensa.tion f'or diBLlising the pl~titt 1 s prospoots of eoploynent and oansi:ng hio - and his·f~~ hc.rdahip fro□ the defendnnt oompaizy-• Before st~..rting hearing the suit, ·Mr• Mkatte le~ed oaunsol for the defendnnt oonpany raised -3. proli.min.ary point argu:L"lg that tho BUit sho-uld be ins-t:i:btrted in_ tho C(>urt of the lowest'• ~ado oonpetent to .tr.r .,it -though tho lli.@.l Court 0r.~C('"'s ~.IDl.ioitod. jurisdioti.on. in oivil a.s well a.s in Crjoina.J 9c:i,scs as provi ~.ed uric1:er seotion 2( 1) of' tho "J'Udioature . ~ and Application of Lavrn Ordiu :nee"' Cap.453 of tho la.we. Mr. Mk..1.tte le2.J."lled oou..-it·, ,1 for t..1-ie dof'endant oompauy subni tted that ' ' every suit .shall be institute<l in the court of the low~ grad.a oompetant to tty it and for this propoc:,.ti0n _he referred mo to seotion 13 C.P.Ce . Ile f'urtb.or. submitted that 0, d.\ 3tr:iot oou:rt when presided by a Civil Magistrate. can try a. civil ca.so where th:c subject matter is capable of being estimatad,_ a.t a r.:ioney val':18 o-f tho value n.ot rorooeding two hundred thousand shillings and he refe~ed me to seotio,; 40(2)(b) of the Magistrates Courts• Aot,1984 Mr• Mk:atte lea:r.nod counsel fer. tho defendant compal'.\Y' oonolud.ed by submitting that in the instcnt_ suit the ',ral.ue of the subjoot rae.tter ola.ici~d is ~s• . 200,000/- as shown in paras \ 3 and 14 of the plaint§ he thus contondod that RM• s Court or c. District Cou.r t presided over by a raagistrato with Civil power· can _hear the oase and ~'.:1der section 13 c.P.c. it is nand.atoey a oourt of the lowest grade oornpeter~ 1, to hear this CA.Bo should ho&' it and under Ord.er 7 rule 10 C.,P.c. this c )Ul't has the power to remit the plaint of the suit to be presented to tho lowest OO'lU't in which the suit should have been institutode In rep:cy- to that Mro Ma]inguinu learned ommsel for the plaintiff admitted that the subjoot ma-t b~ of the suit is of the value of shs.200,!XX}/-- but he ·1s cont.end~.ne that if b.is cliont wins the case, he will be a.warded costs and inta.rGst making tho totaJ. SUil O~;a\!.oad to be sb.a.23of'OOCJ/-. .. However, he prc\VB that if th,:- ~J'Z'-t :t'\1 1.~3 .c:cains~ hiI:l, then he preys that on ratti. tting· tho oase to th.a lowest oourt ; ) f < . . Q ~ ~ to try i t 1 than the oourt should al:lide itself wit 11in- the-ambit of a a o t i o n ~ 2/.... - 2 - I oooplete]y agree with the viows expressed by Mr. Ml'"..atte lem-ned counsel for the defend.ant coop~ the.t u.nder section 13 c.P.c. it is oa.tlda:torr that ovor:, auit ..should-~-in.s:titu.ted in the_ Qouri of··the - ~ ·· :: grade oompeten-b to try it•. It he.a bea;,1 ~onoeded by ~. Malint,"'UI:Itl lea.rn~l . . oo,msel for the plo.intitt that the . subjoo:t. . ~ matter of the sait £or hit? olient is a olcl.o of tho SULl of. shs.2oc;t)OO/~• Tb.is being the position, a Rtij1s. · Court or a Distriot Court pro.sided ovor. by a mtigistrn.te ha~ civil ·jttrisdi- . otion oan hoa:r this oase• I aooo.rcli2lgl3' uphold. Mr. !)k..,ttG I s submissions under seotion 21 -(l)(a) c.P.c. I orde:r.- ·tb.ct .this suit be tranate:i:rod to Xisu.ru Distriot Oou:r.-t for trial by a. IllDeistrate oompetent to heal! it~ Pl,a.intif".t is to bear oosts. (c.G.MTENGA) JUDGE 12/6/1989. "»oliveed· in· obmnbors in 'tho_ prosont of 'both Oounsal this 12th d.ey o£ June, 1989. (C,G~GA.)_" . .TlIDGE. l.2/6/1989. I certify t:.:at it is a t::·ue ancl coi--rect copy of t2'e oric;inal. t 8mlIOR D ~ & f f ~ ;-.