john mahinini vs pangea minerals ltd 2018 tzhc 2051 14 december 2018
Applicant failed to establish sufficient reasons for the delay and did not account for the period between struck out applications; repeated filing of incompetent applications without explanation does not warrant exercise of judicial discretion for extension of time.
- Citation
- john mahinini vs pangea minerals ltd 2018 tzhc 2051 14 december 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: John Mahinini; Respondent: Pangea Minerals Limited
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision Applications, Procedural Delay
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Mahinini
Applicant
Pangea Minerals Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient reasons for delay to warrant extension of time to file revision
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to establish sufficient reasons for the delay and did not account for the period between struck out applications; repeated filing of incompetent applications without explanation does not warrant exercise of judicial discretion for extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
- Right of appeal explained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment