john mao vs ibrahim daniel kididi 2015 tzca 38 2 october 2015

john mao vs ibrahim daniel kididi 2015 tzca 38 2 october 2015

The applicant failed to provide an authentic and credible reason for the delay, as the letter relied upon was questionable in authenticity and timing, and thus no good reason was established for granting the extension of time.

Citation
john mao vs ibrahim daniel kididi 2015 tzca 38 2 october 2015
Parties
Applicant: John Mao; Respondent: Ibrahim Daniel Kididi
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
2 October 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Authenticity of Documents
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Mao

Applicant

Ibrahim Daniel Kididi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

  1. 1 Whether there are good reasons for granting extension of time to file an application for revision

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide an authentic and credible reason for the delay, as the letter relied upon was questionable in authenticity and timing, and thus no good reason was established for granting the extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded to the respondent