john mjema vs shamsa salum 2010 tzhclandd 3 16 december 2010
The Tribunal's decision to entertain and grant an oral application for restoration of possession without a formal application and without hearing the other party was irregular, violated the principles of natural justice, and was not in accordance with the applicable procedural laws.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- john mjema vs shamsa salum 2010 tzhclandd 3 16 december 2010
- Parties
- Applicant: John Mjema; Respondent: Shamsa Salum
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case Revision / High Court Revision of District Land and Housing Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Ruling and orders of the District Land and Housing Tribunal quashed; trial to proceed before a different Chairman and set of assessors; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Restoration of Possession, Natural Justice, Summary Procedure, Locus Standi
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Mjema
Applicant
Shamsa Salum
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Case Revision / High Court Revision of District Land and Housing Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Land and Housing Tribunal was properly moved to grant restoration of possession via oral application
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's ex parte order violated principles of natural justice
- 3 Whether proper procedure was followed under the Civil Procedure Code and Land Disputes Courts Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision to entertain and grant an oral application for restoration of possession without a formal application and without hearing the other party was irregular, violated the principles of natural justice, and was not in accordance with the applicable procedural laws.
Court Disposition
Ruling and orders of the District Land and Housing Tribunal quashed; trial to proceed before a different Chairman and set of assessors; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Ruling and orders made and delivered on 26 May 2009 quashed.
- Trial to proceed before a different Chairman and set of assessors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment