john p kahulo vs mr diper mahendra patel 2021 tzhcld 467 13 october 2021

Applicant failed to show good cause for delay, failed to account for each day, and did not demonstrate apparent illegality; delay of seven years is inordinate and cannot be condoned.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: john p kahulo vs mr diper mahendra patel 2021 tzhcld 467 13 october 2021
Parties: Applicant: John P. Kahulo; Respondent: Mr. Diper Mahendra Patel
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 13 October 2021
Procedural Posture: Revision Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Condonation Dismissal
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Condonation, Constructive Dismissal, Limitation Period
Source Language: english

Labour Law Extension of Time Condonation Constructive Dismissal Limitation Period

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

John P. Kahulo

Applicant

Mr. Diper Mahendra Patel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Revision Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Condonation Dismissal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for condonation of late referral to CMA
2 Whether inordinate delay can be excused by alleged promises or illness
3 Whether illegality is apparent to justify extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to show good cause for delay, failed to account for each day, and did not demonstrate apparent illegality; delay of seven years is inordinate and cannot be condoned.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Application for revision is dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.